Compare Lockheed Martin vs Cytec BETA
See how working at Lockheed Martin vs. Cytec compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Lockheed Martin vs. Cytec. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.Employee Ratings
- Lockheed Martin scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
★★★★★
★★★★★
(based on 6987 reviews)
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Overall Rating 0.9 higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
★★★★★
★★★★★
(based on 142 reviews)
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
★★★★★
★★★★★
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Career Opportunities 1.3 higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
Career Opportunities
★★★★★
★★★★★
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
★★★★★
★★★★★
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.4 higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
Compensation & Benefits
★★★★★
★★★★★
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
★★★★★
★★★★★
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Work-life balance 0.9 higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
Work-life balance
★★★★★
★★★★★
Senior Management
Senior Management
★★★★★
★★★★★
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Senior Management 1.0 higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
Senior Management
★★★★★
★★★★★
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
★★★★★
★★★★★
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Culture & Values 1.0 higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
Culture & Values
★★★★★
★★★★★
CEO Approval
CEO Approval93%
93%James D. Taiclet
Lockheed Martin employees rated their CEO Approval 35% higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
CEO Approval
57%
57%Shane D. Fleming
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
Lockheed Martin employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 33% higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
Lockheed Martin employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 41% higher than Cytec employees rated theirs.
Positive Business Outlook
Salaries
Lockheed Martin has 12 more total submitted salaries than Cytec.
Salaries for similar jobs
Salaries for similar jobs
Software Engineer2 Salaries
₹ 81,982/mo
Management Trainee1 Salaries
₹ 4,46,063/yr
Financial Planning and Analysis1 Salaries
₹ 11,72,799/yr
Salaries for similar jobs
Consultant Civil Project1 Salaries
₹ 9,43,200/yr
Customer Service Executive1 Salaries
₹ 10,77,899/yr
What Employees Say
- Lockheed Martin had 394 more reviews than Cytec that mentioned "Good benefits" as a Pro.
- Lockheed Martin had 134 more reviews than Cytec that mentioned "Work life balance" as a Con.
Pros
Cons
Featured Review
"Asc position"18 May 2020
★★★★★
I have been working at Lockheed Martin full-time for less than a year
Pros
Unexpected salary, highly advanced environmental
Cons
No downside of Lockheed Martin
Advice to Management
Company dealing with artificial intelligence and aerospace sector which is positive point.
"Lack of Professionalism!"4 Mar 2010
★★★★★
I have been working at Cytec
Pros
* Flexible timing. * Freedom while working. * Compensation is Ok!
Cons
* The Logistics dept is in a mess. (Customers always complaining) * The Order fulfilment system of the Co is the worst I have seen. * The India branch lacks "Professionalism" in the management of... the office. * A total lack of team work and team belonging. Everybody is working in isolation and just for oneself.
Advice to Management
* Improve on the Supply Chain. * Implove to a great extent/Change the SAP/BPCS system in use at the moment. * The India branch lacks "Professionalism" in the management of the office. Bring in some... professionalism.