Compare Sutherland vs Andersen Partnership BETASee how working at Sutherland vs. Andersen Partnership compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Sutherland vs. Andersen Partnership. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
- Sutherland scored higher in 4 areas: Overall Rating, Work-life balance, Culture & Values and % Recommend to a friend.
- Andersen Partnership scored higher in 4 areas: Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, CEO Approval and Positive Business Outlook.
- Both tied in 1 area: Senior Management.
What Employees Say
- "Work environment" was the most mentioned Pro at Sutherland.
- "Commission structure" was the most mentioned Pro at Andersen Partnership.
- "Night shifts" was the most mentioned Con at Sutherland.
- "Long hours" was the most mentioned Con at Andersen Partnership.
I worked at Sutherland full-time for more than a year
Excellent work envirnoment withgood facilities good growth in management
No downside working Good staff mutiple tasks
Advice to Management
Enhancing skills good excellent work experience
I worked at Andersen Partnership full-time for less than a year
Competitive commission structure Pre-existing client base or warm points of contact Excellent systems and resources Young and energetic environment
1. Lack of standardized processes and minimal training 2. Conquer the world with a computer and phone mentality 3. Scare training on the necessity of professionalism when interacting with... clients 4. Consultants often exercise limited control over the recruitment process and blindly throw darts at a dartboard with a mind towards volume rather than accuracy and premium service. 5. Majority of consultants possess a relatively modest level of education and formal business experience
Advice to Management
Strengthen learning and developing; develop formalized processes (e.g. candidate profiles with consultant comments, candidate logs, case studies on organizational design and theory); focus on creating