Compare Teamware Solutions vs Andersen Partnership BETASee how working at Teamware Solutions vs. Andersen Partnership compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at Teamware Solutions vs. Andersen Partnership. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
- Teamware Solutions scored higher in 8 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
- Andersen Partnership scored higher in 1 area: CEO Approval.
What Employees Say
- "Hr team" was the most mentioned Pro at Teamware Solutions.
- "Commission structure" was the most mentioned Pro at Andersen Partnership.
- "Find any cons" was the most mentioned Con at Teamware Solutions.
- "Long hours" was the most mentioned Con at Andersen Partnership.
I have been working at Teamware Solutions full-time for more than a year
Supportive HR department, Salary on time, Good management
I didn't find any cons during my working periods. Not received any increment in 1.5 years.
Advice to Management
Provide salary increment on time.
I worked at Andersen Partnership full-time for less than a year
Competitive commission structure Pre-existing client base or warm points of contact Excellent systems and resources Young and energetic environment
1. Lack of standardized processes and minimal training 2. Conquer the world with a computer and phone mentality 3. Scare training on the necessity of professionalism when interacting with... clients 4. Consultants often exercise limited control over the recruitment process and blindly throw darts at a dartboard with a mind towards volume rather than accuracy and premium service. 5. Majority of consultants possess a relatively modest level of education and formal business experience
Advice to Management
Strengthen learning and developing; develop formalized processes (e.g. candidate profiles with consultant comments, candidate logs, case studies on organizational design and theory); focus on creating