Compare The Risk Advisory Group vs Control Risks BETA

See how working at The Risk Advisory Group vs. Control Risks compares on a variety of workplace factors. By comparing employers on employee ratings, salaries, reviews, pros/cons, job openings and more, you'll feel one step ahead of the rest. All salaries and reviews are posted by employees working at The Risk Advisory Group vs. Control Risks. Learn more about each company and apply to jobs near you.
The Risk Advisory Group company icon

The Risk Advisory Group

Control Risks company icon

Control Risks

Employee Ratings

  • Control Risks scored higher in 9 areas: Overall Rating, Career Opportunities, Compensation & Benefits, Work-life balance, Senior Management, Culture & Values, CEO Approval, % Recommend to a friend and Positive Business Outlook.
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
2.7
(based on 50 reviews)
Overall Rating
(full-time and part-time employees only)
3.8
(based on 218 reviews)
Control Risks employees rated their Overall Rating 1.1 higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
Career Opportunities
Career Opportunities
2.4
Career Opportunities
3.5
Control Risks employees rated their Career Opportunities 1.1 higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
Compensation & Benefits
Compensation & Benefits
2.2
Compensation & Benefits
3.0
Control Risks employees rated their Compensation & Benefits 0.8 higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
Work-life balance
Work-life balance
2.9
Work-life balance
3.6
Control Risks employees rated their Work-life balance 0.7 higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
Senior Management
Senior Management
2.5
Senior Management
3.3
Control Risks employees rated their Senior Management 0.8 higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
Culture & Values
Culture & Values
2.5
Culture & Values
3.8
Control Risks employees rated their Culture & Values 1.3 higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
CEO Approval
CEO Approval
The Risk Advisory Group Ceo David Claridge
63%
63%David Claridge
CEO Approval
Control Risks Ceo Nick Allan
100%
100%Nick Allan
Control Risks employees rated their CEO Approval 37% higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
% Recommend to a friend
% Recommend to a friend
44%
% Recommend to a friend
77%
Control Risks employees rated their % Recommend to a friend 33% higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.
Positive Business Outlook
Positive Business Outlook
39%
Positive Business Outlook
69%
Control Risks employees rated their Positive Business Outlook 30% higher than The Risk Advisory Group employees rated theirs.

Salaries

Salaries for similar jobs
There are no salaries matching this company.
Salaries for similar jobs
Consultant4 Salaries
₹ 20,56,037/yr
Researcher3 Salaries
₹ 8,69,915/yr
Intern1 Salaries
₹ 23,616/mo

What Employees Say

  • Control Risks had 21 more reviews than The Risk Advisory Group that mentioned "Interesting work" as a Pro.
  • "Long hours" was the most mentioned Con at The Risk Advisory Group.
  • "Senior management" was the most mentioned Con at Control Risks.
Pros
Pros
"Interesting work"(in 6 reviews)
"Trag"(in 6 reviews)
Pros
"Interesting work"(in 27 reviews)
"Work life balance"(in 21 reviews)
Cons
Cons
"Long hours"(in 7 reviews)
"Trag"(in 5 reviews)
Cons
"Senior management"(in 14 reviews)
"British"(in 10 reviews)
Featured Review

Former Intern - Business Development Intern

I worked at The Risk Advisory Group for less than a year

Pros

DC office functions like a family, love the energy and perks

Cons

I honestly can’t think of any cons

Former Employee - Consultant, CFI

I worked at Control Risks full-time for more than 3 years

Pros

Amazing work, above average pay scales, if you are a problem-solver - this is where you will love putting your skills to work. By virtue of being "independent" or "foreign", the company gets some of... the creamiest corruption and crisis related work that any nerd could find. You will get good opportunities to work beyond your job description if you can make a case for it. The structure of the company, although large, is relatively flat and flexibly - which means if you have a good idea, implementation is neither slow nor hindered by red tape. Being a company that comes out of war - supports war - profits from war - and that traditionally hired former government employees / ex-spooks / coppas - every one is super happy to be out of government regulations and into self-regulated speeds of how work or information can flow.

Cons

Hopeless HR, Poor mentoring, White-Run, Colonial - The first two being important for young consultants. It will be true that you will be treated like a cog in the wheel, replaceable at a moments'... notice - but then that is how fast companies work. Mentoring opportunities are thrown around as "bait", a massive pool of intellectually strong employees continue to pass through CRG offices the world over - so the idea that this company has massive turn over is spot on. The HR tries hard, but there just is not enough support for employees - who work on some of the most sensitive confidential information.

Advice to Management

A robust mental health support division or more training provided on coping with stress during work situations will take this company further. You can't really help the large turnovers, but you can... begin by stop treating your employees like numbers, reducing talk about profitability and increasing talk about intellectual sustainability of solving problems. More pro-bono work would change the way the company is viewed by the left - for example the CRG offices in London featured in several manifestos of the Occupy Movement as a "co-conspirator" of the 1%. Fair enough really, but worth a look in for a company that manages reputations for others.

Job Postings

Control Risks has 36 more recently posted open jobs than The Risk Advisory Group.