Interview process lacked transparency and felt overly controlling. Pros: • Exposure to CSR consulting and proposal-based work • Organisation appears active across multiple CSR domains Cons (long list alert): • Interview process lacked transparency and clear communication • Assessment details were not shared in advance and were communicated only after repeated follow-ups • Candidates were expected to draft proposals in real time under direct observation, without prior clarity or written scope • Reluctance to share interview structure or expectations over email • Communication felt defensive when concerns were raised, rather than empathetic • Strong emphasis on control (physical presence, monitoring during assessment) rather than trust Overall Rating: 1/5