Skip to contentSkip to footer
  • Community
  • Jobs
  • Companies
  • Salaries
  • For employers
      Notifications

      Loading...

      Elevate your career

      Discover your earning potential, land dream jobs, and share work-life insights anonymously.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Integral Ad Science

      Engaged employer

      About
      Reviews
      Pay and benefits
      Jobs
      Interviews
      Interviews
      Related searches: Integral Ad Science reviews | Integral Ad Science jobs | Integral Ad Science salaries | Integral Ad Science benefits
      Integral Ad Science interviewsIntegral Ad Science Network Engineer interviewsIntegral Ad Science interview


      Glassdoor

      • About / Press
      • Awards
      • Blog
      • Research
      • Contact Us
      • Guides

      Employers

      • Free Employer Account
      • Employer Centre
      • Employers Blog

      Information

      • Help
      • Guidelines
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy and Ad Choices
      • Do Not Sell Or Share My Information
      • Cookie Consent Tool
      • Security

      Work With Us

      • Advertisers
      • Careers
      Download the App

      • Browse by:
      • Companies
      • Jobs
      • Locations
      • Communities
      • Recent posts

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" and logo are proprietary trademarks of Glassdoor LLC.

      Company Bowl sample

      Want the inside scoop on your own company?

      Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.

      Bowls

      Get actionable career advice tailored to you by joining more bowls.

      Followed companies

      Stay ahead in opportunities and insider tips by following your dream companies.

      Job searches

      Get personalised job recommendations and updates by starting your searches.

      Network Engineer Interview

      11 Aug 2014
      Anonymous interview candidate
      New York, NY
      No offer
      Neutral experience
      Average interview

      Application

      I applied online. The process took 6 days. I interviewed at Integral Ad Science (New York, NY) in Aug 2014

      Interview

      I applied online and was contacted by the recruiter, who seemed quite friendly, and set up an interview with the director of infrastructure team that afternoon. It lasted 20 mins and he asked me to speak with his team to go through more technical questions. That was organized the very next afternoon. It was an hour-long Google Hangout interview where two people interviewed me. They asked me a lot of technical questions. I answered all the questions correctly that were asked by the first person interviewing me. Most were what I knew and learnt from my internship and CCNA. The second person who interviewed me was a little tough. He asked few basic stuff initially but then went deeper into it, which confused me a little. But I still managed to answer most of them more or less. Overall, I felt I answered almost 85% of the technical questions correctly. I was aware of the fumble that I did for the remaining 15% but I didn't think it'd mean I'd be rejected completely for it. If I was rejected for a person who had more experience, then fair enough. But the recruiter told me they didn't select me because of my "lack of technical knowledge". I was borderline stunned. It was unbelievable, which is a pity really because I loved the job description for this position and had this very high on my priority list despite having gone through few other interviews as well. Too bad I couldn't get further in the interview process at this company because I really loved this position.

      Interview questions [1]

      Question 1

      Most were questions based on what I had learned during my internship and certification. They focused a lot on commands for configuration of Cisco routers and switches. VLANs, ACLs etc. The other person asked about DNS and what's the exact process behind how an internet works when you connect to it. Thats where I fumbled a little but I wasn't completely wrong.
      Answer question
      5