Mortuary for Innovation - Systems Engineer Vantive Employee Review

2.0
18 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The mission is meaningful: developing devices that can directly improve patient lives. Some individual contributors are highly skilled and genuinely care about doing good work. They make good mentors. There are opportunities to take ownership of complex, system-level challenges if you’re willing to push through resistance

Cons

Technical leadership continues to recycle the same flawed systems engineering practices, embedding mistakes instead of evolving from them. New ideas are routinely suppressed by entrenched engineers from the “old Baxter guard,” who cling to outdated methods and prioritize bureaucracy and politics over real innovation. Deerfield HQ has largely forgotten about the Minneapolis R&D center. The site struggles with poor working conditions, lack of visibility, and minimal investment.

Explore other reviews about Vantive

5.0
6 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

On paper, Vantive has strong values, a clear vision, and a focus on innovation. The organization has the potential to be a great workplace, and there are talented individuals across teams who genuinely want to do meaningful work.

Cons

Unfortunately, the reality at the Bangalore R&D Center does not reflect the company’s stated values. Leadership challenges: The top-level management in Bangalore does not consistently foster a positive or inclusive working environment. Decision-making often appears centralized and disconnected from ground realities. While innovation and strategy are frequently discussed, there is a noticeable lack of openness to new ideas, with a tendency toward closed-minded thinking. Lack of ownership and direction: There is a common perception among employees that the center is not being led effectively, with limited accountability in driving a truly innovative and collaborative culture. HR concerns (major issue): The HR function is one of the biggest pain points: • The so called site HR Leader is perceived as unapproachable and judgmental, discouraging employees from seeking support. • There is a lack of psychological safety, leading many to stay silent rather than raise concerns. • Conversations with HR often feel one-sided and directive, with more focus on lecturing than understanding or resolving the actual issue. • There is a perception that the site HR leadership operates with a “know-it-all” approach, often dismissing employee perspectives rather than engaging in open, empathetic dialogue. • Interactions can come across as lacking humility and approachability, which further widens the gap between employees and HR. • There is minimal visible effort toward employee engagement, motivation, or morale-building initiatives. • Feedback mechanisms do not appear to result in meaningful or transparent action. • HR seems to have disproportionate influence over site decisions, overshadowing other senior leaders. This overall environment results in low morale, reduced motivation, and a lack of trust in leadership. Many employees feel unheard, unsupported, and disengaged.

3.0
2 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The factory is very clean and stays around 60 degrees year-round. They also have great benefits.

Cons

Management is a mess. Nobody seems to know what is going on, and they will surprise you with overtime that they swore wouldn't happen. As long as you keep your head down and stay flexible, you will be okay.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All