FMP Consulting Reviews

3.4

69% would recommend to a friend

(36 total reviews)

Erin Pitera

73% approve of CEO

54% positive business outlook

FMP Consulting has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 36 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The FMP Consulting employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

36 reviews
2.0
5 Jun 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

=> Benefits (3 stars out of 5). It’s 2016. Companies have benefits. I think FMP’s benefits are a hair below average, but they get the job done. => Day-to-day responsibilities (3 stars out of 5). Pretty typical for a management consulting company. You’ll mostly spend time facilitating meetings with co-workers and clients as well as preparing typical MS Office deliverables. A lot of this work is boring, but you can work from home as much as you want, which helps. All in all, about average. => Parties and snacks (5 stars out of 5). I’m not going to lie: they just plain kill it in this category. You can gorge on tons of different snack foods at work (highlighted by delicious, homemade baked goods and expensive KIND bars), and you’ll feel pretty awesome at the extravagant work parties.

Cons

=> Pay (1 star out of 5). Their offer was the lowest I have received from a prospective employer in my career; however, tons of companies lowball candidates routinely, so that’s not why FMP gets a low rating here. They get a low rating because their offer wasn’t actually a lowball. In fact, I came to learn that they offered me a high salary relative to other employees with my skills and experience. In other words, I was definitely underpaid, and I suspect that their employees, as a whole, are underpaid relative to what they could get on the market. That’s my opinion, of course. => Performance management (0 stars out of 5). They use (1) annual goals with a numerical rating system; and (2) "client kudos". (1) Annual goals. I was given training on setting my goals. The training encouraged me to use "SMART" goal criteria (specific, measurable, attainable, relevant, time bound), an accepted and reasonable industry standard for goal setting. After writing SMART goals, however, I was advised to re-write my goals using vague, boilerplate language that made it impossible to prove whether I actually hit my goals. That made my numerical ratings seem entirely arbitrary. I actually received good numerical ratings, but that doesn’t make them legitimate. (2) Client kudos. I was encouraged to save snippets of email conversations from clients and submit them for my performance review. Things like, “<my name> did an incredible job on our project and I don’t know where we’d be without her!” These quotes were factored into my performance review. If there was a hidden value sheet where "incredible" is worth 10 points, "wonderful" is worth 8 points, and so on, I wasn't privy to it. I believe that performance management is challenging, and I empathize with those tasked to create performance management systems. That said, this was by far the worst attempt I’ve encountered in my career. => Culture and Leadership (1 star out of 5). Step aside from my review for a minute, and consider the other FMP reviews on Glassdoor right now: - Of the five negative reviews (less than 3 stars), all were either negative or neutral on culture and company leadership. - Of the six positive reviews (3 stars or greater), half were either negative or neutral on culture and company leadership. It’s not particularly interesting to see negative reviews that are neutral/negative on culture and leadership. You expect that to happen. In contrast, though, it’s very interesting to see positive reviews that are neutral/negative on culture and leadership. Taking a common negative from positive reviews is a great way to identify a core weakness, and here we have one. Personally, I experienced a passive-aggressive culture that valued conflict avoidance with both clients and employees. The company leaders were nice people, but they perpetuated this culture. It wasn't a fit for me. Maybe it'll be a fit for you. But probably not.

2.0
31 Mar 2014

Agree with Negative Reviews-Culture

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Getting to work with smart people. Work-from-Home policies and "set your own hours" policies. Above average pay. Many of the people here have deep skills in what they do and this company's staff can provide specialized I/O expertise that is thorough.

Cons

Wow. The culture. VERY passive agressive. Unable to discuss openly any challenges or negatives at meetings meant to address project challenges--which means that they do not get sufficiently addressed. This culture really does not allow for any dissent or open acknowledgement of problems to an unusual and remarkable degree. When something needs to be addressed, instead of being direct, they are seriously passive agressive--talking about people behind their backs, saying one thing to someone's face and doing the opposite (yes, I am talking all levels, but particularly the Sr. level). Another Con: cannot manage a project of any real scope or size effectively. Terrible project communications (secretive and hoarding all information at the top). They need some real project managers.

1.0
13 Mar 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Most people are welcoming and supportive

Cons

There is no management Managers manage workloads not people Matrix system leads to major gaps in communication and feedback loops Provide feedback for first time when employment decisions are being made Little to no career development Non-confrontational, passive environment means feedback is never relayed, but is used against you in performance reviews I worked as a human capital intern for FMP consulting for almost year. My contract was extended two times without hesitation or discussion. They actually asked me to stay on when my summer internship contract was coming to an end. I was getting really positive feedback. I was making major contributions to projects, leading data analysis, bringing new ideas to the table that people seemed to value, and my project manager was telling me I was prioritizing things correctly. So when I asked to start the conversation about staying on full-time once I graduated in August, I thought it would be a pretty easy transition. I already felt like a full-time member of the team. My colleagues were telling me things like "you're kicking 8 miles of butt", "thank you for leading this effort", "you always make me think differently when I talk to you", "I like that idea, let's do that", "this looks great", etc. I thought I was a member of the team. However, when my performance was reviewed in January, I was told I wasn't a "good fit" for full-time employment (8 months before I had requested full-time work) but I could continue with part-time contract work. This is while they are actively recruiting for full-time positions. In addition to the names I provided to get feedback from, two additional high-level people were asked about my performance, one of which I had only worked with on 1 task that lasted a total of 3 days. Both of these people I had very little direct contact with while working. They did not ask the managing consultant that I worked with every single day, and who said she was pleased with my performance. In my review, one of the pieces of feedback I was given was that I was not proactive enough, and the example was that my colleagues had to ask me multiple times for something for the client. The problem with that feedback is 1) I was never involved in client communications or meetings, so I could not anticipate such needs without this information, 2) there was never a set schedule communicated to me that I needed to provide this information on, instead people would come to me in an ad-hoc manner, and I responded in an ad-hoc manner, and 3) during this time, my project manager told me I was prioritizing my time appropriately and focusing on other more pertinent accounts. PLUS, no one ever TOLD me that I needed to be more proactive on this project or that this would impact me getting a full-time job. There was no feedback provided about this until my review. No one should ever be receiving feedback for the first time when a hiring decision is being made. And that is exactly what happened here. I was also told that as an intern, I was being judged on the same scale as a consultant, and that most interns liked this because they "weren't running to get coffee". While I appreciate that FMP does reach this extremely low bar for internships, it makes no sense to review a part-time intern on the same expectations as a consultant, who has different hours, more expertise, gets paid more, has benefits, different titles, etc. etc. There was also some pretty condescending feedback like I was a "good fit" for marketing (my previous career) but never "showed any interest". Not only did I show interest, I literally spoke to the social committee about Google Ads and told them I would love to help them because I still enjoyed marketing/advertising, I asked about joining the social committee but was never responded to, I helped created my more aesthetically pleasing slides for various accounts and internally, I wrote 3 blogs, and provided social media ideas during large group meetings. If that's not showing interest, I'm not sure what is. Plus, no one ever said "hey, if you want you could do some marketing for us, what do you think about that?" It just felt condescending to provide positive feedback in the form of saying my old career skills is where I shined as I tried to transition to a new career. I had received plenty of positive feedback in my new career, but that wasn't used in my review. The value of "fit" over the quality performance and outcomes that I helped create on all my accounts is telling. This company wants carbon copies of very type A people - and they value that over actual performance. Many reviews on Glassdoor mention it being cult-like, and I think this is the culprit. They don't want diversity of thought, they want employees to immediately fit the mold, which is why they don't manage or develop their people. This is what I mean with they take the "human" out of human capital.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 36 Reviews

Glassdoor has 41 FMP Consulting reviews submitted anonymously by FMP Consulting employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if FMP Consulting is right for you.