Skip to contentSkip to footer
      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      PNAS

      Is this your company?

      PNAS Reviews

      2.8

      26% would recommend to a friend

      (11 total reviews)

      11% positive business outlook

      Ratings by category

      2.7

      Work/Life balance

      2.5

      Diversity and inclusion

      2.5

      Compensation and benefits

      2.2

      Culture and values

      2.2

      Senior management

      2.2

      Career opportunities

      Reviews by job title

      11 reviews
      1.0
      3 Aug 2021

      Toxic work environment and poor benefits

      Editorial coordinator
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      - Recognizable name - Decent editorial experience - Cubicle spaces are renovated - 100% vested retirement plan as soon as you start working

      Cons

      - Extremely toxic work environment - Low pay compared to other journals - Poor management team - Very high turnover (people are constantly leaving, some less than 6 months to a year into the job) - Micro-managing - Extreme divide between management and rest of staff - Unclear guidelines and limited opportunities for promotions and growth - Lack of diversity within staff - Heavy workloads that continue to grow as staff leave

      1.0
      24 Feb 2021

      Find a Different Journal

      Media coordinator
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      Nice office Interesting papers to read Recognizable name

      Cons

      Toxic work environment Micro-managing High turnover rate No room for promotion/growth Low salary and weak benefits Higher management would rather replace lower positions every 6 months-1 year than retrain or replace mid-level managers

      2.0
      2 Apr 2020

      Not god awful but I can't imagine someone who should take an entry level there

      Editorial assistant
      Recommend
      CEO approval
      Business outlook

      Pros

      The retirement plan through TIAA is a vestige of PNAS's government charter or something like that. It's a good retirement plan that you can't get without being a government employee or, apparently, working through NAS. Not many hours if you don't want them but I think that's so they don't have to pay you. Don't be fooled; they make millions of dollars in profit and can afford to pay you.

      Cons

      You can find higher paying jobs, in whatever discipline you're seeking, with better benefits that will give you more responsibilities, etc. This is a dead end job--you won't learn to do anything marketable, and you will be poor, which will leave you stuck there. Management is incompetent, which leaves employees disgruntled, and turnover high.

      Viewing 1 - 3 of 11 Reviews
      Related searches: PNAS jobs | PNAS salaries | PNAS benefits | PNAS interviews
      ReviewsPNAS reviews

      Glassdoor has 18 PNAS reviews submitted anonymously by PNAS employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if PNAS is right for you.