Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Automattic as 50% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3.17 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Happiness Engineer and Senior Software Engineer rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Senior Software Engineer and Software Developer roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at Automattic takes an average of 14 days when considering 6 user submitted interviews across all job titles. Candidates applying for Code Wrangler had the quickest hiring process (on average 7 days), whereas Happiness Engineer roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 18 days).
This was the worst recruiting process I’ve ever experienced.
There are too many steps: a long-form application, a call with a recruiter plus an AI tool so others could review the transcript later, an IQ test, a personality test, a case study from my own work, and a 1-hour written interview on Slack about that case study. Then came a “consultant project” on a topic of their choice with feedback rounds and required iterations, followed by additional interviews. All of this had to be done inside their internal systems: joining their server, setting up a proxy, configuring SSH keys, and working in a Slack channel with about 10 people reviewing my progress, plus 2 separate recruiters. I don’t need to say anything else.
But I will: it doesn’t make sense. It’s conceited, and it’s pure overhead. Read again all the steps I went through and run away.
I applied online. I interviewed at Automattic (Boston, MA) in Jun 2026
Interview
I had a disappointing first-stage interview experience.
The interview was conducted over Google Meet and recorded using Gemini. I was not asked for consent in advance; I was informed at the start that the conversation would be recorded. That felt uncomfortable and could have been handled more transparently.
The interview was also rescheduled twice, including one reschedule that happened at the time the interview was supposed to begin. During the actual interview, the interviewer seemed rushed and unprepared, and the meeting ended about 10 minutes early due to their schedule. For a first-stage interview, that lost time felt important because it limited my ability to provide relevant context about my background and fit for the role.
The questions themselves also felt very surface-level. They did not meaningfully evaluate the skills or experience that seemed relevant to the position, and the structure of the conversation made it difficult to demonstrate technical depth or role alignment.
Overall, the process left me with the impression that the interview was designed more for speed and convenience than for a thoughtful assessment of candidates. I would have appreciated better scheduling, clearer communication around recording, and questions more directly tied to the actual responsibilities of the role.
Interview questions [2]
Question 1
What is your understanding of the position we are hiring for?
Communication was effectively facilitated through Slack. A take-home project was assigned, to be completed within compensated hours. Overall, the experience was highly positive.Communication channels were highly effective and streamlined the process. The assignment of a take-home project allowed for focused work on a specific task. This project was completed within the allocated compensated time. Overall, the project management approach proved to be efficient. The facilitated communication greatly contributed to a positive experience.