Dar Group interview questions

I recently attended an interview with this organization, and unfortunately, it was one of the most disappointing experiences I have encountered. The interviewer’s approach lacked professionalism and constructive evaluation. Instead of assessing my technical knowledge through structured questions or problem-solving discussions, the interaction felt dismissive and biased. The feedback provided was vague, stating that I was “not technically strong,” without offering any specific examples or areas for improvement. Moreover, the interviewer made generalized assumptions about my work experience, implying that I only execute assigned tasks without independent research, which is not an accurate reflection of my professional capabilities. A good interview process should be a two-way discussion that evaluates both technical competence and problem-solving ability in a respectful manner. Unfortunately, this experience did not meet those expectations. Pros: Opportunity to attend the interview Cons: Lack of structured technical assessment Unprofessional and dismissive communication No constructive feedback provided Advice to Management: Improve interviewer training to ensure candidates are evaluated fairly, with clear technical discussions and meaningful feedback.

They just short listed by the Resume, no Aptitude test was taken, they wanted my students from our college, took 24 students among Electrical, Mechanical, civil and EnTC, equally divided almost.