I applied through a recruiter. I interviewed at EveryMatrix (Sliema) in Apr 2025
Interview
The interview process consists of the following:
- First: written test
- Second: interview with manager
- Third: interview with hr
- Finally: raven test
- Reference check
The whole process lasted one month.
I applied online. I interviewed at EveryMatrix (Bucharest, Bucuresti) in Aug 2025
Interview
First I had a tehnical and english test at their office. The tehnical one consisted of DSA, OOP and Java questions, but it was okay. After that, I had an 20mins interview with the HR. I also passed this one and I have a tehnical interview with someone at their office. The interview went pretty well, i got some feedback during it and the guy that interviewed me was actually very friendly. After a few weeks I found out that I passed that interview too and they asked me, for the last step of the recruitment process, to solve an online assignment that consisted of a few math and logic questions. In the end, i got the results of the test, they were very good, but they told me that they chose someone that was a better fit for the team. I was kinda disappointed, but all in all, the interview experience wasn t bad at all.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
The tehnical interview consisted of a few data structures questions and then some very easy code fixing
I applied through a recruiter. The process took 6 months. I interviewed at EveryMatrix (Cape Town)
Interview
The process started on a positive note. Communication and coordination from the HR side were professional, clear, and respectful throughout, which I appreciated.
The first interview was engaging and values-driven. There was a strong emphasis on respect, honesty, and maintaining a healthy work–life balance—principles that resonated with me and set a positive tone for the process.
The second interview, however, was a very different experience. The tone felt noticeably more adversarial. The focus shifted heavily toward very specific company and client knowledge, with limited room for discussion around approach, reasoning, or transferable skills. Despite having prepared thoroughly, the format felt more like a test than a conversation.
I was also asked to roleplay scenarios and respond to hypothetical situations, but the interaction involved frequent interruptions and dismissive pushback, which made it difficult to fully articulate my thinking. There was limited time allocated for questions, so I left the interview without a clear understanding of the role’s day-to-day responsibilities or team dynamics.
While I understand the importance of evaluating candidates under pressure, I believe interviews are most effective when they allow for mutual exchange and insight.