The interview process started with an online HR screening call, and the HR employee was highly professional. I had a nice interaction with her. The next round was a ~35 minutes coding assessment, to test your coding skills. The question was super easy, but they were adamant about using CoderPad as the online editor, and Python as the compulsory language to code (unfortunately, the interviewer invitation said otherwise and that they were flexible with the IDE and the language, but that was not the case). CoderPad had such a poor interface, that it took me a long time to understand how to interact with the editor. I couldn't complete such an easy problem in time, because my main coding language has been Java (although the interviewer did support in translating the Java functions to Python). Also, the interviewer kept poking around while I was coding, which was annoying (because of which my attention was also diverted). It would have been nice if they were transparent about the coding-round process. I received an email about the negative result the next day. I am slightly disappointed by their way of communication about the coding round, and suggest other readers practice accordingly (it seems to be a good company). I hope the HR team takes notice of this feedback if they want to hire great engineers.