Skip to contentSkip to footer
  • Community
  • Jobs
  • Companies
  • Salaries
  • For employers
      Notifications

      Loading...

      Elevate your career

      Discover your earning potential, land dream jobs, and share work-life insights anonymously.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Paige

      Is this your company?

      About
      Reviews
      Pay and benefits
      Jobs
      Interviews
      Interviews
      Related searches: Paige reviews | Paige jobs | Paige salaries | Paige benefits
      Paige interviewsPaige Big Data Software Engineer interviewsPaige interview


      Glassdoor

      • About / Press
      • Awards
      • Blog
      • Research
      • Contact Us
      • Guides

      Employers

      • Free Employer Account
      • Employer Centre
      • Employers Blog

      Information

      • Help
      • Guidelines
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy and Ad Choices
      • Do Not Sell Or Share My Information
      • Cookie Consent Tool
      • Security

      Work With Us

      • Advertisers
      • Careers
      Download the App

      • Browse by:
      • Companies
      • Jobs
      • Locations
      • Communities
      • Recent posts

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" and logo are proprietary trademarks of Glassdoor LLC.

      Followed companies

      Stay ahead in opportunities and insider tips by following your dream companies.

      Job searches

      Get personalised job recommendations and updates by starting your searches.

      Big Data Software Engineer Interview

      18 Jul 2020
      Anonymous interview candidate
      New York, NY
      No offer
      Negative experience
      Easy interview

      Application

      I applied through a recruiter. The process took 5 days. I interviewed at Paige (New York, NY) in Jul 2020

      Interview

      First red flag : I was told at the beginning of the tech phone screen call, that this would involve a shared coding exercise but had been given no advance warning as to what would be required. Second red flag : The problem presented required specialist knowledge of specific image compression theory. No problem I thought, giving the interviewer the benefit of the doubt that they were a reasonable human being and I would be able to get clarification along the way about the data structure so that I could solve the problem. What happened through the rest of the call would prove that I was wrong. Third, fourth, fifth red flags : The interviewer gave a vague "explanation" of what the data type was and what the problem to be solved was. It was unintelligible and he often mumbled his responses no matter how many times I tried to ask different questions. He seemed purposefully and unnecessarily cryptic. I spent over 15 minutes trying to get a clear explanation out of him with no luck. By this point I was more than half way through the time allocated to solve the problem. I politely concluded that the interviewer had no understanding of the data structure let alone how to solve the problem without the fore-knowledge that he had. He impatiently wanted to push on without even helping me understand the problem clearly. I started to write some code while he watched someone who he had denied any understanding try to solve his interview hazing question. While I was able to get fairly far I was well aware that the code was not going to solve the problem. He never came across as genuine in his communication at any point. In fact he even used the word "perfect" for describing part of my code when I knew that it was flawed. A few days later on a Saturday morning I received a 'no-reply' cookie-cutter rejection email. The positive part of the interview was that it didn't go beyond this and it told me everything that I needed to know about this company : - That it's culture is not collaborative and doesn't inspire trust. - It's not at all interested in assessing if someone is intelligent or skilled enough to solve a problems from first principles. - It's engineers are possibly incompetent but definitely disingenuous and sadistic. - When it's hiring managers no longer have a use for you any basic common decency toward the candidate vanishes.

      Interview questions [1]

      Question 1

      Implement a poorly specified and undefined variation of a Quad-tree and write a parsing function to initialize it from a 2d array.
      1 Answer
      7

      Bowls

      Get actionable career advice tailored to you by joining more bowls.

      Company Bowl sample

      Want the inside scoop on your own company?

      Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.