Glassdoor users rated their interview experience at Qt Group as 50% positive with a difficulty rating score of 3 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty). Candidates interviewing for Solutions Engineer and Software Engineer rated their interviews as the hardest, whereas interviews for Solutions Engineer and Software Engineer roles were rated as the easiest.
The hiring process at Qt Group takes an average of 60 days when considering 2 user submitted interviews across all job titles. Candidates applying for Software Engineer had the quickest hiring process (on average 60 days), whereas Software Engineer roles had the slowest hiring process (on average 60 days).
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
There were 2 steps that I took.
- Tech
General and basic cpp questions. The programming depth wasn't deep since the interviewer wasn't in a tech field.
- Behavioral
They asked me how I would handle the project, how I would take it to your client.
I applied online. I interviewed at Qt Group (London, England) in Feb 2026
Interview
Interviewed for a role after prior similar application (not flagged in their ATS). Recruiter unaware, proceeded normally; no red flags on my end. She then "investigated" my history and auto-rejected next day. No pros, as for the cons: Poor internal systems which wasted my time. My advice is : Sync your ATS properly before re-contacting candidates for similar roles months apart
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
tell me about yourself and why did you apply for the role
It started off well, but one major issue was the lack of a clear process and timeline. The interview journey felt scattered, with long gaps of 2–3 weeks between updates and next steps. After nearly two months, I was informed that recruitment was being paused due to planning for the next year.
This delay could have been avoided with better timeline checks and a more structured hiring process from the start. For a non-technical role, it’s difficult to understand why the process extended beyond a month.
The explanation also raised some doubts, and I would have preferred more transparency,
whether that meant a hiring freeze or budget changes. It was especially disappointing, as this is an organization I’ve long admired and genuinely hoped to work for.