I applied online. I interviewed at Verkada (San Mateo, CA) in Feb 2021
Interview
Online Assessment that was 3 questions then a Phone Screen. Finishes with an onsite which was 4 interviews in a row. The people were nice and sadly I apparently gave a bad impression in one of the 4 interviews. The interviewer wasn't responsive during that one interview but the others seemed nice.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Questions about finding all pair wise intersections between a list of n tuples. each tuple is (key => list).
Implement a key value store with a snapshot feature.
Questions about memory requirements of a simple Neural Network.
I got the interview by referral. After a call with the recruiter, I got the invitation for phone interview, which is a OOD. I need to implement APIs based on the requirements with Python.
The interviewer arrived late exactly by 9 mins, I was informed that the interview format was one leet code coding, a small system design and some questions towards the end. So in the interview I worked on the problem and came up with the working solution. Still 12 minutes were remaining for 1 hour mark and also 9 more minutes as the interviewer was late by 9 mins (almost 21 mins remaining). The interviewer instead of asking the system design question abruptly ended the interview with "ask any questions". I understand the interviewer may have different expectation even if i provided a working solution, but the format of the interview should be respected, i.e including system design round too. Abruptly changing the interview format midway shows pure arrogance on part of the interviewer. I understand the decision to take the candidate to future interview rounds or making and offer is totally yours, but you can do a better job by making the interview process fair.
4 parts - a call with a recruiter, a frontend technical interview (eg; building out a UI in a timed session), Leetcode style interview, and a behavioral interview with the engineering manager.