Skip to contentSkip to footer
  • Community
  • Jobs
  • Companies
  • Salaries
  • For employers
      Notifications

      Loading...

      Elevate your career

      Discover your earning potential, land dream jobs, and share work-life insights anonymously.

      employer cover photo
      employer logo
      employer logo

      Vonq

      Is this your company?

      About
      Reviews
      Pay and benefits
      Jobs
      Interviews
      Interviews
      Related searches: Vonq reviews | Vonq jobs | Vonq salaries | Vonq benefits
      Vonq interviewsVonq Senior Software Engineer interviewsVonq interview


      Glassdoor

      • About / Press
      • Awards
      • Blog
      • Research
      • Contact Us
      • Guides

      Employers

      • Free Employer Account
      • Employer Centre
      • Employers Blog

      Information

      • Help
      • Guidelines
      • Terms of Use
      • Privacy and Ad Choices
      • Do Not Sell Or Share My Information
      • Cookie Consent Tool
      • Security

      Work With Us

      • Advertisers
      • Careers
      Download the App

      • Browse by:
      • Companies
      • Jobs
      • Locations
      • Communities
      • Recent posts

      Copyright © 2008-2026. Glassdoor LLC. "Glassdoor," "Worklife Pro," "Bowls" and logo are proprietary trademarks of Glassdoor LLC.

      Company Bowl sample

      Want the inside scoop on your own company?

      Check out your Company Bowl for anonymous work chats.

      Bowls

      Get actionable career advice tailored to you by joining more bowls.

      Followed companies

      Stay ahead in opportunities and insider tips by following your dream companies.

      Job searches

      Get personalised job recommendations and updates by starting your searches.

      Senior Software Engineer Interview

      27 Apr 2019
      Anonymous interview candidate
      Rotterdam

      Other Senior Software Engineer interview reviews for Vonq

      Senior Software Engineer Interview

      29 Mar 2021
      Anonymous interview candidate
      London, England
      No offer
      Neutral experience
      No offer
      Negative experience
      Difficult interview

      Application

      I applied through a recruiter. The process took 6 days. I interviewed at Vonq (Rotterdam) in Apr 2019

      Interview

      an outsource recruit mailed me about the company but he informed wrongly, he mailed me the company provides few days working at home and unlimited holiday etc. Then I had calling with recruit asked me some questions like why i was looking for new opportunity etc. Then he offered my cv to CTO which accepted to talk to me and I had interview with CTO directly, also CTO asked me why i was looking for new opportunity. everything was okay, Vonq sent me an assigment and online test. The assigment was so details and took my whole weekend. Also the online test about many topics, like Spatial, Numerical, Linguistic perceptions, Control, Calculate and personal test, that were really amateur and stupid tests. I sent my assigment and done tests. 3. step i had interview with their developers, they liked my project gave some positive and negative feedback. then they said i passed and 4. step with CTO again, interesting the CTO asked me so weird question and said they don't provide to work at home. The looked for someone who working hard and also he pretended my purpose of looked for new opportunity!. then they sent me weird pretext for no offer. Their process totally bad and unnecessary hard. Vonq is not quality company to do it. Absolutely i dont offer them it would just wasting your time.

      Interview questions [2]

      Question 1

      Backend PHP Assignment This document describes the evaluation assignment for the position of a Backend Engineer. Required technologies to use are: PHP. Preferable, but not required, technologies to use are: Symfony framework Techniques: ● Object Oriented ● Code should follow SOLID principles ● 3rd party libraries should be installed with a package manager, like Composer General Info What are we assessing ● Application architecture ● REST API Design skills ● Coding style & quality overall ● Programming patterns On theoretical level, we are looking into: ● Communication skills ● High performance design skills In general architectural choices are important to us. What are we NOT assessing We do not expect beautiful pages. You should consider that a frontend developer will be giving a hand to make things pretty in an actual team. Time We understand that you are busy with more things, so the time you can afford to put on any parts of this assignment depends on you. However we would like to know when (date) you expect to come back to us with your solution, and how long you expect it would take you. See it as a mini project. Also in real life scenario, you would be giving a guestimate and commit to a milestone, right? The Exercise 1 A bit of context Let’s assume we are a startup that wants to build a social network application to manage people’s connections in a high traffic scenario (millions of unique visitors per month). Yes... We are ambitious! ;-) People connect in groups to meet regularly. The website has registered users and the goal of the application is to create connections within the users and facilitate them to organize meetings within their groups. The users can be logging in with their linkedin/facebook/local account. Let’s also assume that a user can RSVP on a meeting of a group and that all users can access a (near-real) time report on a group and meeting popularity. We know it may seem familiar...but fear not! We will not be asking you to implement the whole meetup.com ;-) It is just to give you context, perhaps inspire you regarding domain model and help us describe the exercise in hand... The (actual) assignment A. ​REST Service The heart of this social network application should be a REST service that facilitates social networking functionality: - request to create a relationship with a fellow user in a group - list of a user’s current connections (with different filtering possibilities...you can improvise on this) The input and output for this REST service is for you to define. We would love to see how you would design and implement such REST API. B. Data The structure of the repository to accommodate user connections is for you to define. C. To UI or not UI? Give us a way to see your API in action, and if you like, optionally, you can surprise us with any FE skills... and, no worries, remember we won’t be shocked if the UI looks ugly or you fall back to command line. What we need is a super simple interface to handle the following functionality: ● see list of users ● invite a user to connect ● see a user’s connections ● optionally, A way of filtering ● if you like surprises, anything like search/sorting/paging is more than welcome 2 Deliverables In your submission, we would like you to include: a. All code (frontend, backend, any QA assets) developed to create this functionality b. The DB script that generates the structure and the data to run this application c. A working app hosted anywhere you like (amazon free tier?) OR installation instructions For convenience sake, for points a & b, you can use a code repository like Github or Bitbucket and share it with us. Bonus Questions 1. It’s a big plus if you add (some) tests to your code (let us see your QA skills) 2. Looking at the description of the context, please provide architecture diagram(s) on how you would technically design the functionality described for this application in a scalable way. You can decide yourself what types of diagram(s) will help you communicate to us your thoughts about building such application. 3. Which parts of the application would you have implemented differently and why, should you have more time? 4. If we would have asked you to unit test your code with 80% code coverage, which parts would you cover, which not and why. How would you be able to verify and prove to us that you achieve such coverage?
      Answer question

      Question 2

      41 - ......... = 63/6 (from calculate test)
      Answer question
      1
      Difficult interview

      Application

      I applied through a recruiter. The process took 1 week. I interviewed at Vonq (London, England) in Mar 2021

      Interview

      The application process was a little strange in a couple of places. Firstly I never received a job spec. I was put in touch via a recruiter, who brought Vonq to my attention. I spoke for 45 minutes with someone who I believe to be the lead developer for the growing UK based team. It was a pleasant conversation and I'd go as far as to say the best opening call I have had with a company recently. I was put through to the technical assessment phase, which consisted of a coding task. There was an option to do this either as a paired programming exercise, or a take home test. I favoured the take home option, but was happy to compromise that I discuss (via email) my thoughts/approach to the problem before I attempted to solve it. The technical assessment was strange in that there was minimal detail to the problem (all information was contained in a couple of short slides). It appeared to me on discussion with the lead developer that the assessment was to replicate the scenario of being assigned a loosely defined ticket. The problem was to implement in Python a solution to a non-trivial algorithm, that seemed to be a variant on the bin packing problem. However the solution wasn't to be a simple stand-alone script, (as many technical assessment seem to be). I had to somehow deploy my solution as a working API using AWS. I wasn't provided with an AWS account, and so had to use my own, and foot the (albeit very minimal) costs of hosting my solution. I gave a detailed email explaining my thoughts and approach to the problem, and received little useful guidance. I was concerned that the vague "you shouldn't spend more than 2 hours coding" timeframe was going to be way too short to implement a solution and deploy it. Particularly as I was not familiar with how I would deploy my solution. After reading around into what the appropriate algorithm was to solve the problem, I discovered it was already solved and that implementations of this algorithm exist online. If this task was to be a realistic 'how would you approach this in the real world' I considered I was use a tried and tested solution rather than attempting to reinvent the wheel. As a result I spent most of the rest of my time focussing on the deployment side of the problem. I've deployed and setup Django servers before, but its not something you do every day, and indeed I hadn't done this for a couple of years, so was definitely rusty/googling around for guidance. In the end I managed to get an API deployed containing the solution to the main problem (although not all sub tasks) within an afternoon. Overall I considered this a success, but felt I had massively rushed the whole task, taking shortcuts wherever possible to get myself to this respectable point. I also noted that I hadn't actually written much Python as I had clearly stated my solution was heavily based off the implementation of the algorithm I found online (something I made clear I had done). I was rejected at this stage of the application process, with the underlying theme being that they expect more from a senior developer (which is a decision I'm not contesting). I was also criticised for seemingly 'not understanding' the implementation of the algorithm. I was disappointed that the task seemed poorly structured and unrealistic for the time frame. Perhaps Vonq are looking for someone who are already fully familiar with their tech stack, but this wasn't made clear beforehand if they are. In summary: + Quick process: (Monday initial call, late Tuesday sent task, Weds afternoon I did the task, late Thursday I had feedback) + Interesting company/projects + Good initial chat with lead developer - Poorly defined task, with minimal guidance provided despite my detailed efforts - Unrealistic timeframe for someone who isn't overly familiar with every part of the problem - Had to host my solution at my own cost Given the lack of job spec and seemingly poorly defined task perhaps I was one of the first to go through their application process for this role.

      Interview questions [1]

      Question 1

      Deploy an API to AWS
      1 Answer