Crowd Analyzer Reviews

1. The engineering process had some major flaws. It was the main drawback for me through my experience there. In my opinion it didn't cope up with such a mature engineering culture. I won't illustrate further about it since it's no longer enabled. They already started with a new process just before my departure. 2. The office was crowded, Also before my departure they were starting to moving out to a new office so this won't be a problem anymore. 3. Sometimes they tend to over-engineer some work with the intention of doing it the best way possible. In some situations things could be simpler in order to save time, efforts and to avoid unnecessary complications but overall this is a debatable technical perspective, there isn't an absolute right or wrong.

Management: 1. Over-controlling management, the CTO specifically. He's very nitpicky and honestly a little rough when giving feedback. 2. They have a very arrogant attitude in general. 3. "We appreciate our people" is a theory they're having a hard time to apply. 4. the CTO is the center of the company basically. Nothing moves forward or even moves at all sometimes without his involvement. Thus, everything is slowed down. 5. They are never wrong and it takes them a long time to correct course when it's necessary. 6. They don't listen. 7. At the time I was there, we used a quarterly, performance-based KPIs to get paid the rest of the salary. The KPIs were designed to be almost impossible to reach without working at least 10 hours/day. I'm not sure if this policy is still in action but it was a cause of huge frustration and disappointment. HR: 1. They make a lot of promises that they can't fulfill. 2. The company can virtually run without them. 3. They kind of add more friction and they don't get your back at all, they're always on the management's side 4. Very judgy and unaware of the impact of their actions on the general culture