Reviews by job title

99 reviews
2.0
5 Apr 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Potentially a good starting point for entry level candidates as you are exposed to a wide range of processes and projects within the sector. Lovely offices in London and Apsley.

Cons

-Low salary in comparison to their competitors. -Work culture - it is a hierarchal organisation and had experienced that it was very popularity based and cliquey. The environment serves more extroverted individuals and does not foster an environment or provide the same opportunities for those who are not as favoured. - Lack of communication and poor management. Communication from the company was poor regarding layoffs and structural changes. Communication was also poor from managers regarding performance and development and I had received little to no support. -The junior positions are admin/process led. If you would like to build your technical capacity this may not be the job for you.

3.0
23 Jun 2025

Business Development

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good Salary (Above Market Average)

Cons

Salary structure isn't transparent. Employees of the same position might be getting paid 2-3 times over.

4.0
4 Mar 2025

IT Support

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fexiable work environment for employees

Cons

Lower salary compare to the job market.

4.0
21 Sept 2025

Positive experience

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work culture. Growth opportunity is there.

Cons

Sometimes had unclear instructions and salaries were very low

1.0
31 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job. Decent salary. Non executive colleagues were good people. While this review focusses on the last few months, my overall experience at DAI were not great. No pay raise in years, despite stellar performance reviews. HR and payroll could not get it done. Cleaning up significant fraud and mismanagement in country with no real support from HQ. In fact, since the internal audit had travelled and given a clean bill, there was outright resistance. Layers and layers of VPs meant that no one was actually really managing much of anything.

Cons

DAI prides itself on ethics with annual ethics training. There is always a focus on respect for the global community, cultures and people. While the US Executive Order and subsequent Stop Work Orders may have come as a surprise, DAI demonstrated disdain for staff, particularly national staff, and inadequate leadership far from being remotely up to the task. They were very slow to accept the reality and make sound timely decisions. When decisions were made, they were damaging. DAI has had layers and layers of Vice Presidents. In 5 years, I had not even met or interacted with the VP for USG programs or any other VP. They were an aloof group. Not even an email. Most of us did not even know the names of these leaders. None of them had any real idea of the field work or the staff. A financial cash flow crisis began in 2024 and DAI was unable to provide sufficient wire transfers to cover costs. We were never told the reasons but have speculations of poor investments and resource mismanagement. Certainly, the layers and layers of VPs on indirect were an extremely costly bill and the collective output is questionable, at the least. When the EO was announced DAI was suddenly flat out of money. National staff were not paid for 3 months, while HQ staff, mainly white persons, continued to receive full salaries demonstrating the continued ease with which white Americans get ahead at the expense of brown and black persons. Vendors went unpaid. Chiefs of Party handled those issues with little to no concrete senior executive support from DAI. Lawsuits mounted. Threats came in phone calls and physical visits to offices. Stunning silence and shooting responsibility back down the line from the DAI President. There was expressed disdain when Chief of Parties raised inquiries about staff salary and vendor payments. A decree was issued where we were not allowed to ask or make verbal statements in meetings with the President; we had to write them in the chat boxes, where she picked and chose what she would answer. This was allegedly to save time, but we suspected she did not want to take the heat from us or answer questions. US furloughs were ,made and reversed. Communication was sent out regretting the loss of US staff. When the majority of national staff left the organization within days of each other, there was not one word from the DAI leadership. No expression of gratitude. No remorse. It was clear thjat DAI only really values the US based staff, who are predominantly white. DAI exists because of the work of the national staff who tirelessly implement and bring in millions of USD in indirect. The disdain and dismissal by the DAI President cannot be underestimated, nor can the insult to staff. When DAI brought back staff to assist with close out, we had either extremely capable competent colleagues or we had incompetent, lazy staff who did nothing. The selection process was neither consultative or transparent. We have closed country offices with unpaid vendors. Some national staff were offered consultant agreements at a fraction of their monthly salaries, furthering an already wounded insulted group. DAI may rise from all of this. There will always be people in need of work. However, anyone who was employed during this period will enter DAI employment with eyes wide open. Staff will be unmotivated expressing minimal commitment. I am not sure if DAI’s leadership has any idea about the damage they have caused to themselves.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 99 Reviews

Glassdoor has 698 DAI reviews submitted anonymously by DAI employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if DAI is right for you.