Diablo Reviews

3.4

40% would recommend to a friend

(6 total reviews)

Steven J. Rivera

59% approve of CEO

19% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

6 reviews
1.0
31 Jan 2018

Everyone hates it here

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Healthcare, I guess. And with the exception of a few individuals, there are some wonderful people who work there.

Cons

This company is in such shambles--sometimes literally, as in the case of the carpet that's falling apart--it's hard to know where to start. Morale has been on sharp decline for a long time now, and consequently, the turnover is outrageously high. In the past year alone, Diablo magazine has lost its managing editor, a digital coordinator, an associate editor, TWO art directors, and an editor in chief (and from what I hear, it's about to be TWO editors in chief). And that's just one department--the turnover has been just as bad across the entire company. The "leadership" is a joke. The president of the company has no plan and readily admits to it, and he spends more time doing line edits for the magazine than actually trying to grow the company. The editorial director is extremely unprofessional, and she spends more time manipulating and undermining the editorial team (on multiple occasions, she tried to get me to turn on my colleagues) than figuring out ways to grow the magazine. But the worst of them is the "creative" director, who hasn't had a fresh idea since the early '90s. He actually believes he can do no wrong--meaning you will have to go along with his bland, uninspired, and often nonsensical design choices. And that's not even mentioning the "former" owner that dictates editorial and art from afar. On top of that, this company is a lawsuit away from going under. Its treatment of its female employees is absolutely atrocious. If you're a woman, don't expect your ideas to get taken seriously, and don't expect to be paid at anywhere near the rate men are paid. I am a male, and I started at the company as an assistant editor for DCP; when I transferred to the magazine, the woman they hired to replace me earned almost $10/hr LESS than I did. And as an associate editor at the magazine, I found out I made nearly $10,000 MORE than the female managing editor, and almost $20,000 MORE than the other (female) associate editor. Stay away. Even if you just graduated and are trying to break into the industry, find somewhere else to work. This company is a dead end, both in terms of your career and your soul. Trust me, you can do better.

4.0
11 Jun 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great office, new computers, fun people. Great location, near the freeway and BART. Most people are very friendly and competent. You get hands-on experience doing whatever it is you'd like. Lunches are 1 hour and schedules are very flexible.

Cons

Pay, especially for younger employees, is extremely low. Also, some employees feel as though they are simply working to line the magazine founder's pockets, and that's pretty much true. Steve Rivera seems nice, but rarely speaks to the newer/lesser-paid employees and wears extremely expensive suits and cologne every day. Sometimes it feels as if he's rubbing it in your face. The sales people are equally obsessed with money and material items and it's very difficult to relate to them. One editorial staff member left his job as an assistant editor making only $24k -- that's slave labor.

1.0
18 Jan 2018

Low morale, low pay, no benefits, bad leadership

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's one of the few print/publishing companies in a tech-heavy region.

Cons

It's a bizarre place to work. The folks in leadership have been there for 20+ years and are deeply ingrained in the way things have always been done. The founder retired years ago but still runs the company from afar. Newer employees will never meet him, but your life will be affected by his whims and decisions. The management in the building is indecisive, bad at managing people, and completely without a plan as to how to how move forward into the digital age. As a result, they have lost a lot of business and are extremely strapped financially. When people leave, they aren't replaced. Positions are cut or made into part-time positions. There's no HR department, no system for performance reviews, and no raises have been given in 7+ years. There's a handful of long-time employees that need to go. The edit and design leadership is stuck somewhere in the late 80's - when those folks were in their prime. Sales is struggling because there is literally no social media department, no interactive department, no digital support, and they can't compete with other companies that have made investments in those areas. They have actually made 1-2 hires that were intended to bring about those types of changes, but could not make the systemic changes needed to support those people. The long-time employees were threatened, just didn't like or understand the new ideas, politics got involved, and those newer people have been driven out. If you are interviewing there under the idea that you are going to help them bring about the changes needed – run. Day-to-day, expect for your time in the office to be carefully tracked. They do not support any type of remote work. They literally do not have the tech in place to allow you to work from home if needed. You are definitely expected to be in the office from 8-5, and will be questioned if you are missing. Very old-school in this regard. If you are a women, know that the organization is still stuck in the past. I've seen women discriminated against - replaced by men with half the experience. I've witnessed the way covers and stories are chosen and it's highly discriminatory against women of color/shape/size - not because of the staff, but because, despite how good a story is, the leadership question at the end of the day is, "but is she cute?" Again, they are operating under a 1980's mindset. They tend to hire a lot of women, because younger women tend to be more willing to work for much less money, but know that your ideas will not be valued, and you are definitely replaceable. Instead of worrying about making money, the president gets involved in petty employee issues that he should be shutting down completely. No one is manning the ship, and the remote founder and 1 or 2 long-time employees are running the place, asserting their authority in weird places, and making calls that they should not be making. There's a couple of diva-personalities in leadership and they can be really nasty to work with. Lots of undermining, lots of passive aggressive behavior, and literally no support or validation takes place. Younger employees complain that they aren't learning anything here. No mentorship takes place – you are expected to just produce what you're told. The pay here is ridiculous. Again, those in higher positions do fine, the others, not so much. There are people that have been working there for 10+ years and make $45k. Newer, younger people come in at about $25k - $35k. Not nearly enough to survive in the Bay area. It's another reason they can't attract digital-savy people - there's no incentive for people with those skills/knowledge to work here.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 6 Reviews

Glassdoor has 11 Diablo reviews submitted anonymously by Diablo employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Diablo is right for you.