Pros
No substantial positives observed during the course of association. Organizational strengths, if any, remain difficult to identify.
Cons
The list is extensive: Leadership lacks clarity and direction. Despite constant involvement, tangible outcomes remain elusive. Policies are highly opaque and not employee-centric — minimal leave structure, no laptop provisions, and expectations of constant availability. Reliance on WhatsApp for official communication blurs boundaries between work and personal life. Compensation structure is heavily skewed toward variable pay, minimizing fixed salary and maximizing output expectations. Severe micromanagement — leadership is present on nearly all calls, often directly questioning individuals about ongoing tasks in a non-transparent manner, even behind people's back. Disproportionate workload allocation with unrealistic timelines, seemingly more focused on exerting pressure than optimizing productivity. Bringing in new hires instead of giving promotions.
