CHS looks like a great company on the outside! - Health Care Technician Atrium Health Employee Review

3.0
29 Nov 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Able to visit a CHS dr for only $10! But Obamacare is changing that...as of 2016 everyone will be on a 70/30 plan (CHS can't help this)....Once you get passed the 90 days, you are set in your job! If you have issues....remember everyone has a boss! Able to go above your boss if things are not settled. Around 4,000 people are hired each year, but around 500,000 people apply each year (This was told at orientation August 2014) Able to transfer to a new worksite within CHS 6 months after hire date, then yearly after that. Manager has to release you though (could take a while).

Cons

If you are doing something wrong, your boss will not tell you until it is around time to get a bonus! (you get bonuses, as long as you have no write ups)....I was called AT HOME on a holiday for my manager to tell me that I have not been doing things correctly and she wants to come in on HER DAY OFF to do my yearly evaluation to talk about everything I am doing wrong!! I asked her why she didn't tell me immediately if I was going something wrong and she made up some lame excuse! Ridiculous....and lack of policies and procedures...many things are "understood"....so if your trainer doesn't tell you everything you should know, then you are assumed to know it!

Explore other reviews about Atrium Health

5.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good benefits, work life balance

Cons

have to use PTO for holidays

1
2.0
21 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I spent many years in outpatient rehabilitation and saw firsthand how much meaningful patient care can happen when clinicians are empowered. Earlier in my tenure, there were real opportunities for growth, mentorship and professional development. The team was collaborative and deeply committed to patients, and support staff worked hard under challenging circumstances. Those are strengths worth acknowledging.

Cons

As leadership changed, the culture around performance and advancement shifted. Over time I felt that institutional memory, specialty expertise and long‑term contributions were not valued consistently. Promotion practices seemed opaque, and I saw clinicians with substantially less experience and questionable communication acumen move into roles without clear explanations. Most importantly, I experienced increasing friction between high performers and leaders whose roles felt more performative than grounded in clinical or operational expertise. That tension appeared to be tolerated by the institution. Questions about decisions were discouraged, and requests for discussion went unanswered—even when they came from people with decades of service and a record of strong outcomes. After years of above‑average performance reviews, the feedback I received near the end of my tenure seemed inconsistent with my record and, in my view, hypocritical. This sudden shift in narrative felt like a mechanism to justify decisions already made rather than an honest assessment. For clinicians who invest deeply in their programs and relationships, contradictory or last‑minute feedback is demoralizing and undermines trust in the review process. Although department leaders appear to view themselves as emotionally intelligent, my experience was quite different: they delivered polished, stoic performances but did not exhibit the empathy, listening, or unbiased 360 assessment skills that clinicians need from leadership. That disconnect was another source of friction between high performers and management.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All