Pros
Colleagues always spend their own lunch break going out to buy coffee for certain staff and deliver birthday presents
Cons
Some staff with only slightly more experience, behaved in ways that felt disrespectful and dismissive. They would mock students privately. Those inappropriate staffs also criticised and laughed at new hires in ways that questioned their intelligence and suitability for the job. Basic questions were sometimes met with condescending remarks, making it intimidating to seek guidance. Despite being assigned mentors, staffs frequently found that promised support was unavailable. Tasks were redirected, responsibilities avoided, and some guidance seemed designed to subtly disadvantage newcomers while protecting certain favored staff. Management repeatedly adjusted work hours and responsibilities with little explanation. Certain employees, particularly male colleagues would receive more stable schedules, while others experienced sudden cuts or shifting expectations. Communication about policies or updates was inconsistent, and new hires were sometimes excluded from key discussions or updates. The workplace offered minimal benefits, and even full-time positions lacked health insurance or formal contracts clearly specifying employment terms. Staff could feel isolated, ignored, or excluded from group communications, which added to stress and uncertainty. The environment could be emotionally draining. Even when the boss noticed that you were panic by her exploitation, she would not change her attitude. After leaving, it was difficult not to continue feeling the effects of disrespect or humiliation, sometimes even affecting sleep and mental well-being. While working with students could be rewarding, the combination of favouritism, inconsistent management, and a lack of support made the workplace challenging and often demoralising. If you value fair treatment, transparent communication, and a supportive environment, you may want to consider other options.