Pros
Great Leadership but only the USA Teams has the liberty to learn from them, present their ideas and get transparent feedback, Great Product, Shark Tank Funded, The CEO Dave is visionary and ambitious, Training and Enablement are great. Amazing Tech Stack.
Cons
I joined this organization with genuine optimism and high expectations. Like many others, I believed it would provide a stable environment for professional growth, merit-based career progression, and an opportunity to build a long-term career. Unfortunately, my experience was very different, and I feel it is important to share it honestly so that prospective employees can make a well-informed decision before accepting an offer. This review is based entirely on my personal experience and observations during my time with the company. Every workplace is different, and others may have had a different experience. However, the issues described below were significant enough that I believe they deserve serious consideration. The first and perhaps most concerning issue is employee retention. During my time with the Pakistan team, I observed an exceptionally high level of employee turnover. To the best of my knowledge, I did not see employees remain with the company for more than approximately six months after joining. While I cannot speak for every employee or every department, the turnover I personally witnessed was extraordinarily high and created an environment where teams were constantly changing. New employees would join, spend a short period trying to adapt, and then leave or be replaced. High employee turnover is often a symptom of deeper organizational issues rather than an isolated problem. It affects team morale, disrupts collaboration, increases pressure on remaining employees, and makes it difficult to establish a culture of trust and stability. It also raises legitimate questions about whether the organization is providing employees with sufficient support, career opportunities, and reasons to stay for the long term. One of my biggest concerns was the quality of local leadership. In my experience, leadership often came across as dismissive rather than supportive. Employees should feel comfortable raising concerns, sharing ideas, and seeking guidance without worrying that their feedback will be ignored or minimized. Unfortunately, I did not consistently experience that kind of environment. Good leadership inspires confidence, encourages collaboration, and develops people. In contrast, my experience was that communication was often one-directional, feedback from employees did not appear to receive meaningful consideration, and decisions lacked transparency. This created frustration among team members who genuinely wanted to contribute and grow within the organization. Another area that I found particularly disappointing was career progression. During recruitment and onboarding, there appeared to be an expectation that internal talent would be given priority when leadership positions became available. Merit-based promotions are one of the strongest motivators for employees because they demonstrate that hard work and consistent performance are recognized and rewarded. However, based on what I personally observed, this expectation was not reflected in practice. To my knowledge, only one manager was promoted internally during my time with the company, and that promotion was well deserved. Beyond that, several management positions were filled through external hiring rather than by promoting experienced internal employees. While external hiring is sometimes necessary and can bring valuable perspectives, repeatedly overlooking capable internal candidates can have a negative impact on employee morale. Many employees invest significant time learning the company's products, processes, customers, and culture. When they repeatedly see leadership opportunities filled externally despite prior expectations, it can create the perception that internal career growth is limited or unpredictable. Whether or not that perception reflects management's intentions, it can discourage employees who are working hard in the hope of advancing their careers. Transparency in promotion decisions is equally important. Employees generally accept that not everyone will be promoted. However, they also expect the process to be fair, consistent, and clearly communicated. In my experience, the criteria used for promotions and management appointments were not always clear. Better communication around qualifications, performance expectations, and selection criteria would likely improve employee confidence in the process. Compensation was another area where I experienced concerns. Based on my observations, employees performing similar roles did not always receive the same level of base salary or commission structure. Differences in compensation may sometimes be justified by experience, market conditions, or negotiation. However, without transparent communication regarding how compensation decisions are made, such differences can lead to confusion and dissatisfaction among employees. Fair and transparent compensation practices are essential for maintaining trust within any organization. When employees believe that colleagues performing similar work receive significantly different pay or commission structures without a clearly communicated rationale, it naturally affects morale and perceptions of fairness. One aspect that particularly disappointed me was what felt like a traditional call-center approach to employee management despite expectations of a more modern, growth-oriented work culture. Employees increasingly value professional development, autonomy, recognition, and transparent communication. Organizations that rely primarily on rigid management practices without investing in employee engagement may find it difficult to retain talented individuals over the long term. Despite these criticisms, I want to acknowledge that no organization is entirely negative. I had the opportunity to work alongside talented, hardworking, and supportive colleagues who genuinely wanted the company to succeed. Many individuals demonstrated professionalism, resilience, and dedication despite the challenges they faced. My concerns are directed toward organizational practices and management decisions rather than the employees themselves. Constructive criticism should ultimately serve as an opportunity for improvement. I genuinely believe the company has the potential to become a much stronger workplace if it addresses several key areas. First, improving employee retention should become a strategic priority. Conducting meaningful exit interviews, acting on employee feedback, and identifying recurring reasons for departures could help management understand why so many employees choose not to stay. Second, investing in leadership development would make a substantial difference. Managers should be trained not only to achieve business results but also to coach, mentor, and support their teams. Strong leadership builds loyalty and creates an environment where employees feel valued. Third, the company would benefit from implementing a more transparent promotion process. Internal candidates should be encouraged to apply for leadership positions, evaluated against clearly defined criteria, and provided with constructive feedback regardless of the outcome. Employees are much more likely to remain engaged when they can see a realistic path for career advancement. Finally, greater transparency around compensation and commission structures would help build trust across the organization. Employees understand that compensation may vary for legitimate reasons, but they also deserve clarity about how those decisions are made. For anyone considering joining the Pakistan team, I would encourage you to ask thoughtful questions during the interview process. Inquire about employee retention, average tenure, promotion pathways, performance evaluation criteria, compensation structure, and opportunities for professional development. Speaking with current and former employees may also provide valuable insight into what working there is actually like. I did not write this review out of frustration alone, nor to discourage others from pursuing opportunities that may be right for them. Rather, I believe that honest, respectful, and transparent feedback benefits both prospective employees and organizations that are committed to continuous improvement. My experience unfortunately did not align with the expectations set during the hiring process. I hope the company takes employee feedback seriously and works toward building a workplace that values transparency, fairness, merit-based career growth, and long-term employee success. Those improvements would not only strengthen employee satisfaction but also contribute to a healthier organizational culture and better business outcomes in the long run.