Great Long Term Job - Anonymous employee CLEAR Employee Review

4.0
28 Aug 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The flexibility of the schedule helps create a healthy work life environment especially if you've been there for years. Then, very much the commission. If you are good at sales, you potentially retire here depending on the future of the company.

Cons

The constant changes of different aspects. While commission is great, they do change numbers that make you second guess staying around at times.

Explore other reviews about CLEAR

5.0
15 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I've had a very positive experience here, largely because of the people. I genuinely enjoy working with my manager and team—they're supportive, collaborative, and incredibly talented. There's a high degree of autonomy and trust, I'm empowered to make decisions, take ownership of my work, and have a real impact on the business. CLEAR moves quickly, which creates opportunities to tackle challenges and see ideas come to life. While there are always complex problems to solve, I've consistently felt like I have the resources, support, and cross-functional partnership needed to be successful. I've also really valued the in-office culture. Being together in person has helped me build relationships across teams that likely wouldn't have developed in a fully remote environment.

Cons

The pace can be fast, which isn't for everyone. Priorities can shift as the business evolves, so flexibility and adaptability are important.

3.0
21 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

CLEAR offered remote work, schedule flexibility, and good benefits. The workload was manageable at times, and some leaders were supportive and helpful when available.

Cons

The role often felt fast-paced, high-pressure, corporate, and metrics-heavy. Policies were somewhat clear but not always, and expectations were not always realistic. There were training gaps, frequent policy changes, limited growth opportunities, and not always enough time or support to do the job well. Speed often seemed to matter more than quality. Communication and organization were also challenges. Knowledge documents were difficult to locate, even with keywords that should have produced clear results, which made it harder to assist members efficiently and accurately. Some feedback from management also felt discouraging because mistakes were not always approached as coaching opportunities.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All