CPS not friendly to external hires - Senior Analyst CPS Energy Employee Review

2.0
6 Feb 2013
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They have their own lunch room and the food is terrific. They have a great wellness program. I think Mr Benaby is doing as good a job as the city will allow. Customer rates continue to increase at a moderate rate. This is directly attributable to the cost of materials, rather than any internal spending issues. Historically, San Antonio's energy costs have been far below that of the rest of the nation.

Cons

CPS would benefit from bringing in an external peer review team to assess the true corporate culture. Management should not be allowed to be present during the interviews so as to encourage employee honesty, and to ensure them there will be no retribution for their honest opinions. Until the culture changes there will continue to be dissatisfaction/dissidence. There seems to be a great deal of in-breeding in the environment. When external employees with technical expertise obtained through degree, certifications and decades of experience are brought in to provide new perspectives, the employees' ideas are quickly stifled by middle management. The same employees, promised supervisory positions, are relegated to support staff positions then summarily dismissed by management for non performance. Their rationale being an external person could never be as trained as well as an internal candidate. Status quo is encouraged by intermediate/mid-management. Further, there are some core personnel allowed to run rampant over all other employees, regardless to their often outrageous behavior. False allegations of misbehavior/or an imbalanced view of disagreements are commonplace. Senior employees provide incorrect direction the new employees follow. When the error is found by middle management, the less tenured employee is counseled. Further, when the new employee has documented they were following the instruction of a specific employee, they are then chastised for documenting the name of the person whose directions they were following. This causes a hostile working environment for many due to the actions of a few. To their detriment, CPS senior management is shielded from the problems by middle management. Finally, no arbitration agreement is required by CPS when an employee begins their employment (like some companies do). However, when an employee files a grievance they are required to sign an arbitration agreement (which states that they agree to waive their right to trial) in order to file the grievance. During exit interview, employees wanting to file grievance with their former managers, are required to sign the same arbitration agreement and waive rights to a court proceeding. A less educated person, not aware of their employment rights, would unwittingly sign away those rights to a future trial by jury.

Explore other reviews about CPS Energy

5.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great for learning how to work in an office setting. Site visits were really cool. Intern events were fun. Worked on projects with the communication engineering team that genuinely helped them.

Cons

The communication engineering department is a little understaffed, they need a few more engineers.

2.0
22 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Decent Government style benefits, on site cafeteria, volunteer events

Cons

I hate to say it, but the organization is going downhill. Employee morale is low in many departments. Working from home opportunities are becoming rare pushing talent elsewhere. Benefits are getting worse by the year. Leaders are micromanaging and the pressure is starting from the top. This is the first time I’ve considered leaving the organization since I’ve been here about few years. I really thought I wanted to retire here, but they are no longer investing in employee well being. They are simply worried about how the view is.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All