Lactation Consultants are treated poorly by nursing management - Lactation Consultant Duke Health Employee Review

1.0
9 Oct 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The joy of working with moms and babies as well as all the other LC's are nice and hard working. The pay is competitive.

Cons

Beware working here as an LC! Current shortage of LC's because 9 quit (75%) all for the same reason and several more looking elsewhere for jobs. The problem is poor management based on bullying and micromanaging from nursing management. LC's are excluded from any decision making or development planning. They have taken away our office at Duke and also our ability to self schedule. They try and prevent the LC's from communicating between the different locations, and there is no Lactation Department anywhere in the Duke Health System, it is just the various nurse managers making uneducated mandates about LC's related to work flow, patient care and etc. They do not want LC input nor do they ask for it. Their current strategy is get as many RN's to pass the IBCLC exam and throw them in there. They want the title only, not the experience or expertise.

Explore other reviews about Duke Health

5.0
16 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Scheduling is quite flexible working 3 12s

Cons

Holiday pay is only for major holidays not Christmas Eve

1.0
23 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The work is meaningful and the team consists of some highly skilled professionals who are dedicated to supporting patients, providers, and the organization. The role provides exposure to complex issues and opportunities for professional growth.

Cons

The department suffers from significant leadership and culture challenges. Employees are hired as experienced professionals but are given little autonomy to perform the work they were hired to do. Leadership frequently inserts itself into routine matters, creating unnecessary delays and fostering a culture of micromanagement rather than trust. Communication is inconsistent and often lacks accountability. Important decisions and changes are frequently communicated verbally without written follow-up, creating confusion and shifting expectations. Employees are expected to remember evolving guidance, identify leadership mistakes, and compensate for communication failures. There is a noticeable gap between leadership messaging and employee experience. Work-life balance, employee engagement, and professional respect are regularly discussed, but many employees do not experience those values in practice. Concerns raised by employees do not appear to result in meaningful change, contributing to low morale and diminished trust in leadership. Leadership often responds to issues by implementing department-wide restrictions rather than addressing the specific individuals or situations involved. As a result, high-performing employees are subjected to increasing oversight and reduced autonomy because leadership is unwilling to address performance concerns directly. Turnover, employee dissatisfaction, and leadership credibility have been ongoing concerns. The department would benefit from leaders who are willing to listen, communicate transparently, accept accountability, and trust the expertise of the professionals they supervise.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All