Pros
The company provides a reasonably flexible environment with a good level of trust, assuming you have a competent manager—though this can vary significantly between teams. It is a solid place to start a career, especially for junior engineers, offering stability and relatively low risk of layoffs if you stand out. There is also plenty of room for improvement, which can be an opportunity for those willing to drive change. Senior staff are often able to influence technology and practices, although this requires initiative. Compensation is generally in line with the market, without being particularly competitive.
Cons
Management practices remain quite traditional, and concepts like Agile or DevOps are sometimes applied superficially, leading to limited ownership and unclear responsibilities. The organization is primarily project-driven rather than product-oriented, which impacts long-term vision and technical consistency. It also reflects more of a service company mindset than a strong engineering culture. Career progression lacks clarity, with internal titles that do not align well with standard software engineering paths. There is limited investment in the tech community, including low presence at local events and constrained budgets for training and conferences. Finally, the overall experience varies widely between teams: some maintain high standards, while others are constrained by legacy systems, budget limitations, or heavy offshore delegation, which can negatively affect quality.