Pros
No flexible timings and Hybrid model
Cons
1.HR support is ineffective. Employee concerns are rarely acknowledged or resolved, making HR functionally irrelevant when issues arise. 2.Lack of structured processes. There is no organized way of working. Processes are unclear, undocumented, and change frequently without communication. 3.Leadership bias is deeply rooted. From the CEO to the Country Head, decision-making shows obvious favoritism. A select few individuals receive priority, irrespective of performance or capability. 4.Low transparency in client interactions. Internal reporting and external communication lack openness, ultimately affecting credibility and trust with clients. 5.Ideas are accepted selectively. Suggestions or innovations are only considered when they come from the leadership’s preferred employees, discouraging others from contributing. 6.Inconsistent decision-making. Most decisions are made through trial-and-error rather than following a standard process or best practices, creating unnecessary chaos. 7.Leadership takes credit but highlights only flaws. Seniors frequently delegate their workload, take credit for accomplishments, and focus only on pointing out inefficiencies instead of recognizing genuine hard work and effort. 8.Misleading hiring promises. Attractive salaries and sugar-coated commitments during hiring do not reflect the real work culture. Prospective employees should be cautious and evaluate their options carefully.