Upper Management needs help - Anonymous employee FEI Systems Employee Review

1.0
1 Dec 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Most people were helpful and friendly at the beginning, and most seemed to respect me and the talent I brought to the company.

Cons

It started out good, but maybe because I was clueless as to what was going on. The further into my tenure I got the more I started to believe that one day the doors were going to be locked and the owner and his wife were going to be gone. They are needlessly cheap when it comes to supplies for their employees, but hire way too many high dollar consultants to "fix" this or that. The unfortunate part is that nothing gets fixed, they just keep changing things for the worse. On top of all this, communication, in general, is very lackluster! There was not one single all employee meeting while I was there, although they claim to do them once or twice a year.

avatar
FEI Systems Response
8y
To help FEI Systems to continue to grow, and address the concerns of our employees, we welcome the comment you provided concerning supplies. Our current and past employees comments help us provide additional service to our employees. FEI System’s continual success providing IT Healthcare solutions to our Federal and State customers is a challenge that is met every day by our dedicated employees.

Explore other reviews about FEI Systems

5.0
17 Oct 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It's very stable here. With a lot of opportunity to grow.

Cons

Hard to push for improvement but still doable.

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Solid pay for experience - Mostly friendly team, including most co-workers and supervisors - Good health insurance options - Fully remote - Company paid for the work computer - Minor perks like "points" in the company store, which had some cute items - Big picture work was meaningful

Cons

- Disorganized training and unclear / contradictory instructions at times - Challenging to get in contact with certain people who have information necessary to do the job. - Communication overall could be much clearer. - Information storage was disorganized. - Small scale, an entire day's work on a section of a proposal could be pointless, entirely thrown out. -- Sometimes this was because the original instructions on how to fill out the section were outdated or incomplete. -- In other cases, the assignment turned out to be redundant. -- At least twice in my tenure of just under a year, the team spent over a week on a proposal, only to be told to scrap the whole thing because the company didn't want to bid on it after all. --- Over time this became pretty demoralizing, at least to me. - One or two highly stressful coworkers / supervisors could create conflict that created a bad "vibe" for the whole day (or week!) - Company prioritized shallow means of boosting morale (cookie party, etc) over doing the time-consuming work to truly improve it. --- That is, no one seemed to be taking the time to figure out what systems or which individuals were the frequent source of conflict / demoralization, and address those with real solutions. Unfortunately, the negative experiences with communication and high-stress team members / leaders led me to leave. Ultimately, I took a writing job at a different company that paid less but had a better team atmosphere. It was worth it. Note: For all I know this may be fixed now. Per LinkedIn, many of the people I worked with (both competent, easygoing people and high-conflict stress-adders) seem to have moved on. So, perhaps the culture has changed positively. You'd probably have to ask someone who's worked there more recently, though.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All