Sinking Ship - Anonymous employee Flagstar Bank Employee Review

1.0
4 Apr 2025
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros to this company anymore

Cons

Flagstar merged with NYCB and thus has got to be one of the quickest collapses I have ever seen. The company is run by private equity who are just getting the company prepped for sale by selling of any valuable assets. Every month there is a round of layoffs. People are afraid to look at their email for the next layoff. I was told in February my job is safe but found out in April it was not and that decision was made awhile ago. This company is not transparent and flat out lies. Pre merger is was a laidback place to work for but the CEO and board got greedy and forced through a merger that shouldn’t have been. There is currently a lawsuit against the company since NYCB lied about their income and losses. Avoid at all costs.

Explore other reviews about Flagstar Bank

5.0
27 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very knowledgeable and helpful people who are experts in enterprise systems

Cons

N/A during my time with the company

2.0
10 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits are decent. Average PTO

Cons

My experience with this company has been disappointing. Branch goals are unrealistic with no marketing or brand awareness to support the high goals and teams feel defeated. Senior leadership often communicates in a demeaning way, which has contributed to high turnover and declining morale. Despite emphasizing the importance of ‘hiring right,’ the President of Consumer Banking has cycled through three heads of Consumer Banking in just three years. The annual review process is long and drawn out (5 month process) and feels inconsistent and more like a popularity contest than a true evaluation of performance. Although the scale ranges from 1–5, employees are told that most ratings will fall in the 2–3 range, with 4s being rare and 5s essentially unattainable. The calibration process appears to focus more on filling predetermined rating quotas than assessing actual contributions. Employees are required to write their own reviews, which are then rewritten by leadership before being sent to HR for calibration. The final ratings often seem influenced more by internal politics than by merit. Annual increases are very minimal or zero. Overall, the environment lacks transparency, fairness, and genuine support for employee growth.

5
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All