Great company to job - Line Manager Fortrea Employee Review

4.0
30 Aug 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1.- Is a company that really takes care of its employees, despite there is a lot of work, always is thinking in the best for the employees. 2.- It is very transparent and honest, Fortrea inform as much as possible any challenge and changing that could impact the employee 3.- of course, salary is competitive according market. 4.- Growth is possible, at least I started as Sr. CRA and I have had 3 promotions in 7 years. 5.- Company has many diverse program that employee can be involved despite just the job,

Cons

1.- Despite I have had the opportunities, in my opinion there are not enough of grwth opportunities at leat in LA. if we are a global company, much of the positions can be distributed in all countries, for example, Mexico does not have any opportunities for financial position. 2.- High level managers need to know (or at least show that they know )the differences between CORE Full service and FSP, when they use to give the status, it looks like they are thinking in full services and not consider the different ways of working in FSP. 3.- If retention is a concern for every CRO and Pharm, budget for integration activities needs to increase for each country/area, especially for LA, I have seen all events performed in other countries and I cannot believe they can perform an event for integration and we cannot due to limited budget.

Explore other reviews about Fortrea

5.0
2 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people, good pay, good work life balance.

Cons

I can't think of any.

1.0
15 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

In my experience, the greatest benefit of working here was the breadth of exposure I gained across my function. That said, much of it came out of necessity rather than design. Due to what I observed as persistent understaffing, high turnover, and recurring rounds of layoffs, I found myself taking on responsibilities that stretched well beyond any defined scope. If you're someone who learns by doing and can tolerate ambiguity, you will walk away having touched more than you would in a more stable environment. Benefits were adequate, though it was my experience that the company announced plans to eliminate dependent coverage starting in 2027, which was a meaningful shift for employees with families.

Cons

In my time here, I found role clarity to be nearly nonexistent. I went without a formal job description for the duration of my tenure, and despite raising it, leadership indicated for well over a year that it was being worked on. That pattern, in my opinion, reflected a broader cultural issue: change was frequent but poorly managed, and directional guidance from leadership felt inconsistent and at times difficult to trust. I personally felt that communication about the company's position and direction was not always straightforward. The organization also appeared, in my view, to default to workforce reductions as a primary business lever rather than investing in stabilization or accountability. When leadership gaps surfaced, my experience was that they were minimized rather than addressed directly. The culture within my dept was also something I struggled with. In my experience, there was significant misalignment around ownership and responsibility, and the dynamic felt more competitive than collaborative. Rather than pulling in the same direction, it often felt like individuals within the team worked against one another rather than in cooperation, which made an already challenging environment that much harder to navigate.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All