Innovative, great company to work for - Anonymous employee Health Catalyst Employee Review
4.0
16 Feb 2017
Anonymous employee
Current employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook
Pros
Provides great benefits, values work-life balance, and it feels good knowing that I'm a part of a company that is constantly striving for innovative solutions to transform healthcare.
Cons
Being a remote employee, it is sometimes hard to feel connected to the corporate office in SLC, both in terms of work and company culture. However, I know that is something the company is constantly working to improve on and these things take time.
Health Catalyst Response
9y
Thanks so much for your thoughts and review! Hopefully you were able to participate in our recent remote team member town hall discussion. It was great to convene a forum and spend an hour on this worthy topic with our team. There is more to come in this regard as well. In the coming weeks expect to see additional efforts to improve connectedness. This is an important topic!
Before 2025, the company's benefits and leadership were excellent.
Cons
As of 2025, all benefits have been suspended until the end of the year.
1
Health Catalyst Response
7mo
Thank you for sharing your perspective. We appreciate your recognition of the strengths the company had before this year and the dedication of team members during challenging times.
As we shape our 2026 strategy, we’re carefully evaluating how we allocate resources to ensure organizational success, identifying where to invest and how to utilize those resources most effectively, all guided by a clear and focused plan.
Your feedback is helpful, and we will continue to communicate updates as progress is made.
-Ben Albert
Great Talent & Culture:
The people here are highly capable, collaborative, and committed to helping each other succeed. The partnership between onshore and offshore teams works well and is a real strength. There’s a culture of grit and stability that has helped the company navigate multiple major transitions over the years.
Mission-Critical Engineering:
The work involves complex data infrastructure that requires deep technical expertise. It can be demanding, but seeing these systems run successfully and support real-world operations is consistently rewarding.
Cons
Wage Compression and Retention Risk:
Compensation for tenured and high-performing staff has not kept pace with the market for specialized data engineering and support leadership. In practice, tenure can feel undervalued or even penalized. This creates risk around losing institutional knowledge and operational continuity.
Stagnant Career Progression:
Contrary to stated expectations, strong performance ratings do not consistently translate into meaningful, market-aligned compensation growth. The process of how compensation is benchmarked lacks clarity in practice, obscuring how compensation decisions are made and what is required to advance.