It’s not news that this company is old-fashioned; however, it’s disappointing to experience how hard Informed resists positive change. The expectations of senior staff are lagging behind the sector and do not create the atmosphere of a modern professional services organisation.
Responsibility is mistaken for trust, loyalty is demanded rather than earned through good leadership, and benefits are applied insecurely to avoid a remote possibility of misuse.
Informed’s leadership is somewhat disconnected; the CEOs come across as overly self-assured and out of touch. The company policies around holidays and sick leave are rigid and hostile. Holiday entitlement must be accrued (at least in part) before use. Any previously booked holiday within your first three months of work must be taken as unpaid, which is unusual when compared with industry norms. Similarly, the lack of paid sick leave in your probation period (which can be up to a year for graduates) risks discriminating against people with chronic or mental health conditions. Requiring disclosure for basic health support is not an adequate provision when considering the possibility of stigma and unconscious bias.
Day-to-day policies also feel outdated. The dress code is strictly “business smart” in theory but inconsistently enforced in practice, leaving employees open to senior staff’s mixed standards (“business casual” is the standard in most tech companies). Hybrid work and general flexibility are positioned as perks that must be earned, which suggests a lack of trust in staff to manage their work. Refusing to allow people on probation to work from home when unwell but capable, either burning a sick day or showing up contagious, feels dangerously short-sighted.
All this, the long probation, rigid 9-5:30 hours, no TOIL, reinforces a culture that values presenteeism over output. With a few modern updates, life here could be much more reasonable.
People Services (HR) normally responds to these reviews with a few paragraphs. These usually offer no substantive discourse and appear as an insecure attempt to defend Informed’s image. I invite whoever has been forced to write the next response - whether to this review or any other - to respond sincerely to the points within, and to feedback that the comments here so far have hurt the perception of Informed far more than they have improved it.
This kind of workplace clearly doesn’t work for me; I don’t believe inflexibility provides any advantages. Obviously, the people making the decisions at Informed believe it has some benefit. I would ask those people to consider the burden it places on their colleagues and employees to fulfil this lifestyle. Work shouldn’t be the focal point of life, and if that’s the culture you’re looking for, Informed Solutions is a better fit for you than for me.