Ethical concerns ... - Editor JobsForEditors Employee Review

1.0
3 Jan 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Since I consider this type of jobs unethical, I can't say anything positive.

Cons

What they don't reveal right at the beginning (I found it out after joining): The orders come from students who are unable to complete their school/college assignments or write their bachelor/master theses. This company hires "writers" who do the job instead of the students and "editors" who proofread them. Then the students submit the assignments as their own and get marks or earn bachelor/master degrees with them. After getting to know this, I quit the job immediately.

avatar
JobsForEditors Response
8y
Dear Sir, We appreciate your feedback. First of all, we do not encourage our customers to use our product as a ready-made job, as they are supposed to use our materials as a reference and take ideas from there. It is clients' personal responsibility to study the materials that our writers write. Also, according to our research, clients choose to focus on their major field of studies, and for various reasons (whether work or parenting) use our service mostly for studying complimentary minors. Moreover, our company has a Social Responsibility Policy. We have identified subjects and fields of study where misuse of research material by the customer could possibly lead to a fake or unearned degree. We have also acknowledged situations where primary human rights, life and health might directly depend on the decisions of our customers, in real-world professional situations. To affect or ensure academic integrity in these areas on our side, if an order falls under the policy, we cancel such an order and issue a full refund.

Explore other reviews about JobsForEditors

1.0
1 Nov 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are no pros to working for an illegitimate company.

Cons

I am sorry to report that I believe this company to be a scam. Jobs For Editors is actually a front for Uvocorp, a company that writes fake papers for paying students to pass off as their own coursework. Uvocorp is located somewhere abroad (they do not disclose their location, but it appears to be associated with Eastern Europe), and they recruit native English-speaking editors from the United States to provide professional editing services, without legitimate compensation, under the guise of remote freelance work. The fact that Uvocorp is located abroad allows them to take advantage of unsuspecting U.S. professionals by effectively dodging all employment and jurisdictional laws. In other words, the company is free to operate according to illegitimate and arbitrary practices. As such, I believe the positive reviews here are fake, and it is clear from the grammatical mistakes contained therein that these reviews are not written by native English speaking editors. Personally, I would not want my documents edited by the people who have written these reviews. Here is how I came to understand the true practices of this company: I was "hired" by this company after completing a multiple choice test, providing a practice edit, and participating in a Skype interview. The recruiters are very friendly and quick to respond, which creates a positive first impression. They are supposedly based in London, yet all of their representatives are non-native English speakers. Eastern European text appeared in some of the emails I received from the so-called London-based staff. Here's where things took a bad turn: I was told to complete a two-week training program, at the end of which I would be paid a set amount before beginning the real work. I spent many hours every day for two weeks studying the materials provided, and I completed all of the exams with scores of 100%, as requested by the supervisor. At the end of the two-week training period, I was asked to complete a "practice edit." I completed the edit ahead of schedule and exactly according to the specifications of the training. Here I will interject to state that I have professional experience working as an editor for a prominent academic journal in the U.S., and some of Uvocorp's editing practices contradict industry standards, but I completed the edit according to the company's rules nontheless. Shortly thereafter, I received a message stating that I had "failed" the practice edit and was being let go from the company. Because I hadn't technically completed the training (even though I did all the work), I was dismissed unpaid. In other words, the company received free work from me, a professional, by terminating our relationship on the final step of the training. As you can imagine, this was a very frustrating position to be in. In summary, I have lost about three weeks of time to this unsavory company, with no income to show for it, and now I must search for another job.

17
avatar
JobsForEditors Response
7y
Thanks for sharing your opinion about our company. We appreciate your honest feedback and would like to clarify the things you mentioned. It's true that JobsForEditors hires managing editors for Uvocorp, which provides academic writing assistance to various clients. We are a UK-registered company with support facilities located in Eastern Europe, and we do not hide our location (our support team members work remotely from different locations in Europe). This information is available on our website, and our recruiter always mentions this fact during the interview. Please, note that all reviews posted here belong to our real editors, many of whom are non-native English speakers who may still make mistakes. We cooperate with editors and writers from all over the world and are proud of our international team. As for our hiring process, each applicant has to complete a test and edit a sample paper at the first stage of the selection procedure. Thereafter, one participates in aSkype interview, which does not mean that it is an automatic job offer. After the interview, the applicant is admitted to the training course (free of charge), which is paid only in case one successfully edits 3 sample papers and starts a probation period. All these conditions are clearly outlined in the messages sent by our recruiter, and it is up to the applicants whether to accept them or not. Besides, we do not use the works edited during the adaptation program for other purposes than evaluation of the applicants' skills correspondent to our requirements. Unfortunately, there are cases when the candidate may be rejected at the final stage of the training course as they fail to demonstrate expected skills acquired in the course of training. Even though there are common standards for all industry players, every company reserves the right to hire employees in accordance with their unique requirements (which are usually predetermined by the specifics of the job). Thus, one and the same candidate may be perfect for one editing position and absolutely unsuitable for the other. All employers want to hire the most suitable candidates, and JobsForEditors is not an exception. If the applicant does not fully satisfy our company's standards, we have to reject them. We wish you the best of luck in your job search.
2.0
20 Nov 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Freedom to choose projects and work timings.

Cons

Very poor pay for experienced professional.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All