Above average, but worse over time - Senior Software Engineer LifeOmic Employee Review

3.0
21 Dec 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pre-pandemic - lots of fun activities, team building retreats, etc. Lots of opportunity if you're willing to sacrifice work-life balance. Hopefully this returns at some point.

Cons

- Mental illness is treated as a weakness. Don't work here if you suffer from mental illnesses. - Demo driven development is most rewarded - leads to inefficient practices and stress/lack of appreciation for those not working on easily demoable work. - Biggest perks aren't possible during pandemic - Too many focus areas and products leads to small teams being stretched thin. In some cases, individual engineers having to split time over many areas. - Equity is non-standard (profit units) which are difficult to reason about due to the many LLCs present and complex passthrough structure. In general, the equity structure is very opaque and I fear it may be possible for funds to be shifted around to benefit majority stakeholders instead of employees for certain scenarios. - Below average benefits. Raises are tooth and nail to obtain. Performance and compensation don't always correlate. - Hiring bar has dropped over time - lower output and expectations over time.

Explore other reviews about LifeOmic

5.0
27 Nov 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

This was my favorite tech job. My manager and coworkers were great! I loved that I got to do so many fun tasks: I got to contribute in UI/UX meetings, troubleshoot customer issues, and build a React app to help with the troubleshooting process.

Cons

Because I wasn't a senior developer, I couldn't continue working remotely. I had to move states if I wanted to continue working as a software engineer.

3.0
30 Dec 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Talented team members who care about what they do

Cons

Team direction and product vision were largely unfocused. Too much energy was spent on technologies and direction that had no business viability. Engineering suffered from lack of product leadership. The CEO would share a vision and engineering with run with it unvetted. What was built was built well, with security and testing in mind, but there was so much waste in the process. People in VP/director level positions didn't attempt to deliver products to earn customers and build the business in a sustainable way. Instead the engineering mindset was to focus on test coverage and execution of the grand vision. There was a huge gap between product and engineering and so much work (months, or even years of time for 3-20 engineers on 6-figure+ salaries) was thrown out. There was little-to-no emphasis on finding product market fit and gaining paying customers.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All