employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MIT Lincoln Laboratory

Part of MIT

Engaged employer

Divisions are like different industries and groups are like different companies--choose wisely! - Anonymous employee MIT Lincoln Laboratory Employee Review

3.0
7 Sept 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Fantastic technical library * Support you (financially) whenever you get a paper accepted to a conference * MIT benefits * Lots of smart people (good logic is essential when working with others) * Lots of cool-sounding projects (at least 90% of them sound really cool) * Management recognizes above and beyond performance with recognition (e.g., bonus) * Multiple high-performers to learn from * If you ask someone a question, he/she is generally quite helpful

Cons

* Part of what being a "flat" organization means is that people simply take on more roles and responsibilities to make the whole organization work. This often leads to technical people being pushed into managerial roles against their will. So despite the title "Technical Staff," you're usually not doing something technical, and probably spending a lot of time creating PowerPoint (aka, Slideware). * The pay is low, even when compared to peer organizations (e.g., MITRE). Also, the workload is always such that you are underpaid for the work that you do. * The lab's mission is to "apply advanced technology to problems of national security;" however, we don't solve many of said problems and thus have questionable impact when you consider parts of the the lab that are less mature than say, radar. This fulfillment aspect is a huge problem. What exacerbates this is that Staff and Management don't truly seem all that interested in solving real problems. We seem principally interested in getting money and doing interesting-sounding work. * There's an expectation for Tech Staff to become "expert" at some new thing without any allocation of projects/resources to that end. You're frequently split between many different projects that have you at varying percentages that the project leads generally do not respect. Some Tech Staff get lucky enough to be on a singly-themed effort for an extended period of time. They generally develop true expertise. However, this is the exception not the rule. * Projects are frequently taken with too little money which strains staff and resources because we generally end up having to pull people from other projects to help complete the projects. * Of all of the cool-sounding projects, maybe half of them are *actually* cool. When you dig down into what people are actually doing, you're frequently disappointed. * If you decide you want to leave Lincoln Lab & the government work world, you will find this attempt to transition difficult, because what you do at the lab is so unique, there aren't very many suitors out there for you (unless, you're lucky enough to spend the vast majority of your time doing technical work).

avatar
MIT Lincoln Laboratory Response
12y
Thanks for your insights. Clearly you have given this a lot of thought. Certainly the pros that you reference are aspects of Lincoln Laboratory that we emphasize: really smart people;helpful staff; and challenging, important work. The "flat" organization offers advantages in easing access to all levels of management and streamlining decision making. Hopefully you are discussing your concerns with your management. We strive to insure that employees have all necessary resources. Your advice to management will be taken seriously.

Explore other reviews about MIT Lincoln Laboratory

5.0
3 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It can vary a lot from group to group, but in general, wonderful place with wonderful people and lots of interesting work going on. Excellent benefits and lots of flexibility to explore different projects.

Cons

Little opportunity for advancement in terms of rank and compensation once you reach technical staff. Additionally (again varies from group to group) expectations of what a staff member does can be unclear and there can be a light sink-or-swim nature to the work, again depending on the group you're in.

4.0
26 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Historically a very stable job, interesting work, great people

Cons

There can be a lack of mentorship for people early in their careers, although your experience will depend heavily on which group you are in. There are only 3 main levels of engineer with very limited group leader positions, making upward mobility limited.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All