employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

MST Insurance Solutions

Is this your company?

High turnover and astroturfing. - Anonymous employee MST Insurance Solutions Employee Review

1.0
17 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

They offer hybrid and remote work.

Cons

Be cautious and ask yourself this question before joining - "what do you think about a company that has the employees write their own google review?"

Explore other reviews about MST Insurance Solutions

4.0
13 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- The company culture is very up-beat and everyone is very open to support one another during busy times! - Remote-Hybrid work - Amazing hands-on training. Not only do you have typical courses, but management takes time to sit down with you and go over your day-to-day strategy and will make recommendations based on their experience. You are not left in the dark!

Cons

- Lots of touch-base calls with management can seem like a micromanaged workforce, BUT if you lead the conversation, are open and transparent and you look at every interaction as a learning opportunity - this is not necessarily a con!

1.0
19 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Remote Work and salary was decent

Cons

I had a very disappointing experience with this company, largely due to how upper management operates. From the start, expectations were unclear and constantly shifting, making it extremely difficult to succeed. There was little to no structured onboarding or support, yet performance expectations were high and often unrealistic. What was most concerning was being placed on a Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) just two months into the role—with no prior formal warnings, coaching, or documented performance concerns. The PIP itself felt less like a genuine opportunity to improve and more like a formality. That impression was confirmed when I was terminated just six days after being placed on it, despite making immediate efforts to address the feedback. In addition, there appeared to be consistent turnover within the Chicago employee benefits team during my time there, which raised concerns about leadership stability and overall team support. This experience felt less like performance management and more like being set up for failure. A company should invest in its employees, provide clear expectations, and allow reasonable time for improvement. Unfortunately, that was not the case here. I would strongly encourage leadership to reevaluate how they onboard, support, and manage new employees. The current approach creates a high-risk environment for employees and reflects poorly on the organization’s culture and leadership practices.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All