employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Mavis Tutorial Centre

Is this your company?

A mess beneath the beautiful packaging - Anonymous employee Mavis Tutorial Centre Employee Review

1.0
20 Nov 2023
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Be cautious of the 'genuine' 5 star reviews here.

Cons

Let's not talk about what has been mentioned umpteenth times here that are packed with the other negative reviews because this has been a perennial issue and my addition here will not make a dent on the mass amounts of complaints on them. Management who does not even know or care what is going on on the ground. Company does not care about their staff. What they care is just profit and increasing value for their pockets. The entire business seems to be operating on a survival mode, plugging gaps here and there without any concrete or immediate solutions. Place is run by favouritism. To stay long, one must "curry favour". There is politics. Those with potential and can do the job are not recognised, unless they are already liked. Management protects those who are in favoured group, even if they are not good workers. Too many to share more. Just read the other reviews. If you ever have the misfortune to be tricked into joining this company, you'll probably experience most of what has been shared by the others.

Explore other reviews about Mavis Tutorial Centre

4.0
14 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Love it, couldn't be better

Cons

New hires are terribly screened

1.0
28 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

* Opportunity to gain teaching experience and work with students from different backgrounds. * Some colleagues and students were supportive and enjoyable to work with.

Cons

* Teachers on medical leave were at times expected to continue conducting lessons remotely instead of proper relief arrangements being made. * Student withdrawals were often reflected negatively on teachers even when the reasons were unrelated to teaching quality, such as relocation or scheduling conflicts. * There was insufficient onboarding and handover support provided to new staff at the start of employment. * Communication and management style varied significantly across centres, and some interactions with management felt dismissive or unprofessional. * Contributions outside the curriculum scope did not always feel acknowledged or valued. * Teacher performance appeared to be measured heavily based on class enrolment numbers rather than overall teaching quality and effort. * HR response times for clarifications and administrative matters could be improved.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All