employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Metropolitan Group

Is this your company?

Serious professionals need not apply. - Senior Director Metropolitan Group Employee Review

2.0
28 Nov 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The competitive salary, comprehensive benefits, and flexible scheduling made MG an especially attractive workplace. The organization is staffed by many kind, highly capable individuals who are deeply committed to social justice, environmental issues, and public health.

Cons

In recent years, the company has undergone two significant rounds of layoffs, primarily affecting vice presidents, mid-level managers, and junior staff, while senior leadership remained in place. The official rationale for these reductions was economic hardship. Operational decision-making is highly centralized, with the CEO exerting substantial control over strategic and financial choices. This has created concerns among employees regarding transparency, leadership capacity, and organizational direction. Although the company has strong potential as a strategic communications agency, employees agree that the current leadership approach has contributed to a challenging and, at times, demoralizing work environment. Many remaining staff members feel constrained by the combination of workloads, competitive compensation that is difficult to replace in the current job market, and limited opportunities for advancement. As a result, despite the organization’s capabilities and high needed services, its culture and leadership dynamics have hindered its ability to fully realize that potential.

Explore other reviews about Metropolitan Group

5.0
8 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

very mission aligned, great work, great people

Cons

teaming can be messy, but that's often the nature of the work we get hired to do.

3.0
30 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are many talented and thoughtful people at MG, and the work itself can be genuinely meaningful. I had the opportunity to learn from brilliant and experienced professionals across teams, which was a highlight of my time. There was also a very diverse staff. It was a great experience to have so many types of people to work with.

Cons

Senior leadership often does not appear to trust the expertise of the teams they hire, which can create unnecessary friction and limit impact. Decisions and assignments can feel disconnected from the day-to-day realities of the work, and there is a noticeable gap between the guidance provided to clients and internal practices. During multiple rounds of layoffs, reductions appeared to disproportionately affect junior staff, while senior leadership remained largely unchanged. This, combined with recurring concerns around how junior employees are treated, impacted morale and trust. Benefits are another area of concern. A switch in insurance providers resulted in limited coverage and confusion for employees outside of the PNW. Many providers were unfamiliar with the plan, and coverage options felt restrictive depending on location. Additionally, a number of company perks appear to be centered on the West Coast, which creates an uneven experience for a workforce that is scattered across North America. Finally, leadership turnover and decision-making at the executive level have also raised concerns about stability and long-term planning. High-level hires that are short-lived signal a lack of strategic clarity and result in wasted time and resources.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All