employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

National Renewable Energy Lab

Is this your company?

Great mission, poor management in R&D Centers - Senior Engineer National Renewable Energy Lab Employee Review

1.0
11 Nov 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you have great ideas for R&D, there are a number of ways to capture funding. This is with the caveat that your research has to align with DOE and NREL goals.

Cons

NREL is also a place where, for many people, where careers go to die: 1) Few opportunities for advancement 2) The office politics are ridiculous, especially when funding gets tight. I've never met a more insecure group of people then when dealing with scientists and engineers. 3) If you make a mistake, then forget about advancing your career. 4) NREL will pay for you to get a graduate degree, but don't expect a salary boost. I know managers that have told people that a degree earned while at NREL is worth less than if you had it at the time you were hired. Bottom line -- If you are in R&D, position yourself to become a line manager or a task leader. If you miss, then your career will stall.

Explore other reviews about National Renewable Energy Lab

5.0
11 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Growth opportunities, manager was good

Cons

No cons come to mind

4.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Incredibly talented, dedicated, intelligent personnel who are highly motivated by the mission. Great opportunities to work collaboratively in a campus-like environment. Reasonable flexibility on work location, with options for remote, hybrid, and on-site work (depending on role and requirements). Good benefits. Fairly diverse workforce for the area (Colorado, USA) with many researchers from other nations. It's a good name to have on your CV if you're an energy researcher.

Cons

Funding is reliant on Congressional whims, and with current administration's aversion to anything renewable, sustainable, or strategic, the risk of layoffs is very high. Leadership team is mostly senior researchers who have peaked but still want to do research and are not effective "business" managers. Communication from LT to staff is pretty much one-way and not always transparent. Typical bottlenecks in getting LT attention. LT expresses interest in operating more efficiently but does not devote real resources to supporting that objective. Silos between business management systems persist. Risk management model is immature (projects, systems, institutional) and most decisions seem to be made based on intuition rather than data. Some progress on diversity representation in management but it's been very slow.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All