employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

New Mexico Environment Department

Is this your company?

Great Remote Job - Environmental Specialist New Mexico Environment Department Employee Review

5.0
17 Feb 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very intelligent and collaborative team

Cons

Having to have teams on all day long when I did not need to use it majority of the time

Explore other reviews about New Mexico Environment Department

5.0
24 Nov 2024
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great coworkers, great place to work

Cons

No work from home options anymore

1.0
21 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

• Meaningful mission — The environmental work is important, and many staff are passionate and dedicated. • Talented colleagues — There are knowledgeable, committed people across the agency who genuinely care about public health and environmental protection. • Opportunities to learn — If you’re self‑directed, you can gain strong regulatory, technical, and program‑management experience. • Flexible work options — Depending on the bureau, telework and flexible schedules are available (but only after you’ve served a one year probation)

Cons

• HR controls hiring and salary — Hiring managers do not determine salary. HR sets the offer, controls the variance process, and can deny a hiring manager’s request without explanation. • Salary depends on résumé formatting, not experience — People with less or no environmental experience can be hired at higher salaries simply because they submitted a fully detailed résumé with MM‑DD‑YYYY dates for every job. If you didn’t know this rule when you applied, HR will lock you into a lower salary and will not correct it later. • Slow, inconsistent hiring process — Variances can be denied late in the process, forcing positions to be reposted and candidates to re‑interview. Timelines can stretch for months to over a year. • Leadership inconsistency — Some managers are excellent, but others rely on performative oversight, unnecessary double‑checking, and inconsistent communication. Staff can feel second‑guessed rather than supported. • Internal communication gaps — Decisions affecting workloads, hiring, or timelines are often communicated late or not at all. • Bureaucratic culture — Processes can feel more focused on optics and control than on efficiency or trust. • Emotional fatigue from inconsistent leadership — Staff may experience frustration when accuracy and initiative are met with unnecessary scrutiny.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All