Pros
- Mission-driven company focused on improving access to nutrition and lifestyle-based care - Flexible remote work environment - Patients generally engaged and motivated - Supportive colleagues passionate about the mission
Cons
- Day-to-day role differed significantly from expectations based on the interview process - Substantial administrative work outside of patient visits, including chart review, patient messaging, documentation, scheduling issues, and prior authorization follow-up - Compensation structure may be less favorable for highly utilized clinicians whose schedules fill quickly, as administrative time may need to be carved out from bookable/compensated availability - Clinical platform felt relatively immature compared to established EMRs, with limited workflow efficiencies, clinical decision support, and other safeguards many clinicians may be accustomed to - Overall workload and compensation model felt misaligned with the realities of providing comprehensive patient care