Great - Lecturer Otago Polytechnic Employee Review

Amazing people, Work/life balance, Flexible schedule

None that I can think of!

As ever, the learners and students are what make an organisation tick - and there are some - increasingly fewer - staff with integrity - but it is the annihilation of integrity in this institution that leaves it struggling with less than one star.

Otago Polytechnic provides a concerning example of ineffective change management. A recently departed acting Chief Executive, who was unsuccessful in securing the permanent role, implemented changes that had a significant negative impact on the organisation’s culture and, for many, the student experience. A staff morale survey conducted in 2025–2026 indicated a marked decline in trust and wellbeing among staff. This represents a substantial shift from 8–10 years ago, when the organisation had a strong reputation for delivering high-quality outcomes for learners. Performance indicators suggest a notable decline, which appears to be linked to shortcomings in both middle and senior management, as well as the loss of experienced and well-regarded staff. These departures have, in some cases, been replaced by individuals perceived as less willing to challenge organisational issues. The organisation has faced a number of formal grievances in recent years, pointing to systemic management challenges. From a staff perspective, there is a perception that advancement is not consistently merit-based, and that job security concerns influence workplace culture. There is also a sense that the organisation’s management approach reflects outdated practices, rather than positioning itself as a leader in sustainable, high-quality, and merit-focused education. While the organisation emphasises quality assurance processes, these are sometimes viewed as procedural rather than substantive. Similarly, although it promotes recognition of prior work experience for learners, in practice there are concerns that experienced professionals are often directed into entry-level programmes, suggesting a gap between stated commitments and implementation.