employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

PA Health Management

Engaged employer

Poor Leadership, Numbers Driven, Disgrace to Human Services - Management PA Health Management Employee Review

1.0
24 Oct 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Fair pay, work from home option, diverse, opportunities for advancement. You will get paid what you are worth for the most part, esp. if you are in a management position. Working remotely is a plus for some.

Cons

Unstable leadership, toxic work environment, poor business model, failing company. CEO is angry and explosive to even the most loyal, hard-working employees. This is due to the fact that the business is failing caused by poor business model and expending less than is coming in. He is impossible to approach with viewpoints contrary to his own. If you want things to go well, just agree with everything he says, even if you see disaster warnings ahead. Leadership badmouths anyone and everyone and does so in front of colleagues. CEO knows nothing of human services and is only driven by numbers. Name will be changed to OneWell soon (great name choice, right? Ignore the grammatical disgrace it embodies); so don't be deceived. Same failing company, same toxic leadership, different name. If this place was registered with the BBB, they would have an atrocious rating.

Explore other reviews about PA Health Management

5.0
24 May 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Very flexible with hours and great training program

Cons

Clients that you work with can be overwhelming

1.0
5 Jan 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work from home Flexibility to schedule visits Diversity

Cons

Leadership Issues: Leadership roles seem to be based on personal relationships rather than qualifications or performance. This has led to decisions driven more by appeasing the CEO than addressing real problems, with some leaders lacking critical knowledge and insight. Ineffective Systems and Overwork: Internal systems designed to reduce workload are plagued with glitches, which ultimately increase the burden on Service Coordinators (SCs). Tasks continue to pile up, and SCs are expected to complete them in tight timeframes, often working overtime without compensation. Lack of Training and Communication: There is inadequate training and a breakdown in communication across teams. Managers are not aligned, resulting in conflicting information and inefficiencies. QA Leadership Concerns: The Quality Assurance leadership lacks flexibility and relevant expertise, hindering performance and quality. Company Priorities: While the company claims to help underserved populations, its actions seem focused primarily on profit, neglecting the well-being of its employees, particularly SCs who are the core of the operation.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All