Pros
The advantages include a good level of autonomy and an interesting network.
Cons
In my opinion, the company’s talents are completely underutilized, and the organization shows no ability to distinguish between someone who is unqualified and someone who is genuinely highly skilled. They waste their employees’ time, pay them poorly, and treat them almost like expendable labor—requiring them to come in at unreasonable hours and pushing sales-style targets that have no strategy, no intelligence, and no long-term vision behind them. The client-support model feels downright medieval: it consists of repetitive, scripted calling, bordering on harassment, with none of the smart, efficient processes that modern tools—especially those widely used in Silicon Valley—could easily provide. There are no real opportunities for growth. The environment is hyper-competitive, political, and chaotic. People steal clients and assignments from one another, nothing is structured, and the value delivered to clients is minimal. From my perspective, the culture is driven by nepotism, where success depends more on flattering the CEO and their family than on actual merit. Employee well-being is treated as an afterthought, while commercial pressure is extremely high—even though the added value for startups and clients is surprisingly low. So my advice is simple: don’t join. If you want to waste your time, go ahead—but you will learn far more and earn far better in a real, well-run company.