employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Pro Group Management

Is this your company?

Do not recommend for this position... - Senior Account Executive Pro Group Management Employee Review

2.0
29 Jun 2020
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

There are three divisions of the company, PGM, PGM Safety, and PGM Captive. The latter two are successful and well managed. There are annual activities for the employees, and they are mandatory but enjoyable. Benefits are on par with most. I experienced annual raises. Employees receive Christmas bonuses and little gift cards and rewards for birthdays and random contests. There is a branded clothing allowance. Due to the business-to-business nature, clients were typically intelligent and welcoming. HR does seem to genuinely care, though it is possible in some situations their hands are tied or they are kept out of the loop concerning management interaction with subordinates.

Cons

Extremely high turnover in the marketing department within PGM. Management update in this department changed the entire culture. What was formerly trust and care turned to intense micromanagement, including location tracking of outbound employees, even long-time ones. The starting base pay is abysmal for a sales position, no matter your level of education or experience. Bonuses accrue and are based on sales, though most activity is administrative in nature. Many 'big fish' will not qualify for the insurance program or prospects are 'owned' by another Account Executive for a myriad of reasons, so it is to your benefit to question program and marketing limitations before accepting an offer. Should you interview, ask about specific bonus structure, the use of the term 'salary', and how they protected their employees regarding COVID19.

Explore other reviews about Pro Group Management

5.0
11 Nov 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

relaxed work schedule, company car

Cons

not enough pay to survive

1
1.0
26 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some individual contributors were capable and motivated despite constraints.

Cons

Lack of effective leadership and minimal support from management. A culture where teamwork and collaboration were discouraged, with decisions centralized to a single individual. Extreme micromanagement, requiring approval for routine decisions, which created significant inefficiencies across systems and processes. Managers were not trusted or empowered, limiting their ability to lead or make timely decisions. Leadership relied on fear and authority rather than trust and accountability, negatively impacting morale. Employees who demonstrated independent thinking, creativity, or offered new ideas were often viewed unfavorably, leading to high turnover and loss of talent. Bonus payout was not in alignment with agreed upon salary outline

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All