Fine place to work - Marketing RedFlash Group Employee Review

3.0
31 Jan 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Small group so you can pitch in and do different things every day

Cons

Not open to change unless it comes from specific people. Each partner has their “favorites” and if you’re not one of them it’s hard to get your voice heard or recognized for the work you do.

Explore other reviews about RedFlash Group

4.0
2 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

It was fun location and nice people to work with

Cons

No growth at all in this company

1.0
20 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

My time with Red Flash Group provided an opportunity to learn a new and meaningful subject matter within the public safety sector, which broadened my professional knowledge and perspective. The hiring process itself was relatively straightforward and did not require extensive effort from the candidate side, though communication and organization during the process could have been stronger. Additionally, many team members who were not directly involved in people management were welcoming, kind, and enjoyable to collaborate with, contributing positively to the day-to-day work environment.

Cons

In my experience, there appeared to be a disconnect between executive leadership and the realities of how middle management teams were being led and supported. Project management, particularly within the government team, often felt inconsistent, with shifting expectations and moving goalposts that created confusion regarding priorities and processes. While self-management and initiative are important in any role, the onboarding and development framework described during hiring and early employment did not consistently align with the support and follow-through experienced in practice. Another concern was the organization’s reliance on personality assessments and Myers-Briggs-style evaluations after hiring. While personality tools can be useful for self-awareness and team development, they at times felt overly influential in shaping perceptions of employees and leadership potential. This created an environment where individuals could feel categorized or limited based on assessment results rather than being evaluated holistically on performance, adaptability, and professional capability.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All