employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Sagent Behavioral Health

Is this your company?

Flexible scheduling but low pay and unclear communication - Outpatient Therapist Sagent Behavioral Health Employee Review

3.0
28 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Flexible for scheduling and allowing work from home -Free supervision if you are not fully licensed -Free CEUs (supposed to be monthly, maybe 8x per year at my clinic)

Cons

-Poor pay, hard to make a good living without seeing 35 or more clients a week especially as unlicensed or a newer employee -Confusing communication from higher ups, mixed messages and unclear answers -Unnecessary programs to track client progress when it is already done through the electronic health record.

Explore other reviews about Sagent Behavioral Health

5.0
14 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leaders share a common goal of increasing access to mental health services. Particularly appreciate the legal work that the team does. Flexible work environment

Cons

Health insurance and pay models can be confusing at first

2.0
7 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Its a good place for newer clinicians to gain experience and receive company-paid supervision. One of the strongest aspects of the organization is the flexibility it offers, including a high degree of control over scheduling.

Cons

Nystrom and Ellie merged several months ago, and since then there has been a notable loss of med providers, therapists, directors, managers, recruiters, HR staff, and employees across multiple departments. Although described as a merger, the transition has functioned more like an acquisition, with little of Ellie’s original culture remaining. The EMR transition was poorly executed and created significant disruption for staff. Required training took place during evenings or weekends, cutting into employees’ personal time and work/life balance. Offering snacks or pizza did not make up for the expectation that staff complete training outside normal working hours. Since the merger, productivity and billing expectations have continued to rise while compensation has become less favorable. Pay increases are based only on years within the organization, rather than prior clinical experience or expertise. PTO offerings are limited, and retirement benefits provide only a minimal employer contribution tied to employee participation. There is also currently a shortage of available clients in some areas, and because compensation is heavily tied to the number of clients seen, many providers experience inconsistent and unpredictable income. Employees who raise concerns or offer constructive feedback often feel dismissed or marginalized, while advancement appears more closely tied to alignment with leadership than openness to organizational improvement.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All