employer cover photo

SpiderSmart Learning Center

Is this your company?

Good pay, but disorganized - Anonymous employee SpiderSmart Learning Center Employee Review

4.0
17 Feb 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay is solid. Boss is very hands-off and approachable. Hours are also flexible as the company is geared towards college students.

Cons

Sometimes the overhead is disorganized and I'm not given the appropriate worksheets to cover with students. Also, I have had to tutor up to four students at once during a single session

Explore other reviews about SpiderSmart Learning Center

5.0
2 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Wonderful students, incredible boss, very fair pay

Cons

None. This is as good as it gets.

1.0
4 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with students. Competitive tutoring pay.

Cons

Please note that this post has invariably initiated, starting with a tutor who has worked here for a few years without ever leaving a review before I left my review…The owner monitors everything, Ergo, a counter review suddenly appears after my first review was removed. I’m sharing my personal experience as a tutor at this center and professional educator with two MAs in English and a PhD in instructional design from R1 universities. I hope this may may be helpful for families and prospective tutors. In my experience, tutors often work shifts of approximately 3–5 hours without any breaks. I was reprimanded in front of students for not doing something I was never taught. The only training I received was one unpaid hour observing a senior tutor go through a prescribed routine. During my time there, the bathroom conditions were frequently unsanitary, and basic supplies like toilet paper were sometimes unavailable. Classroom materials were limited. Tutors typically work with up to three students per hour. From what I observed, students were not consistently grouped by similar age or academic level, which made it challenging to provide targeted instruction. A significant portion of the session involved supervising students as they read from STAAR prep binders and checked their own answers, while tutors were expected to review homework, explain mistakes, help plan upcoming essays, and supervise in-class writing at the same time. In my professional opinion, this structure felt more like monitoring students completing work rather than individualized tutoring or instruction. Since this is not a school setting and students are not receiving grades, the expectations placed on tutors seemed misaligned with the level of support realistically possible under these conditions.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All